SPECIAL MM#372--Do We Need a Federal Dept. of Education?

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:07.612 --> 00:00:20.807
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:20.807 --> 00:00:24.849
Now here's your host, david Kaiser.

00:00:33.600 --> 00:00:34.982
Hello and welcome back to this special podcast episode.

00:00:34.982 --> 00:00:36.104
Yesterday we wished you a very happy Thanksgiving.

00:00:36.104 --> 00:00:38.049
We hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving with your loved ones.

00:00:38.049 --> 00:00:53.008
And in yesterday's podcast we acted like a teacher and worked through a Facebook post and we opened why that can of worms?

00:00:53.008 --> 00:00:56.094
Why we don't need a federal Department of Education.

00:00:56.094 --> 00:01:03.012
We tried to give you the closest thing to the objective truth that we could in our research.

00:01:03.012 --> 00:01:09.888
We said on yesterday's podcast that we would come back today and answer and ask some more questions.

00:01:09.888 --> 00:01:19.087
So, in Socratic fashion, let us begin by asking several questions, shall we First?

00:01:19.087 --> 00:01:23.073
When was the Department of Education first started?

00:01:23.073 --> 00:01:35.156
Well, our research indicates the United States Department of Education, in its current form as a cabinet level department, began operations on May 4th 1980.

00:01:35.156 --> 00:01:56.626
As in the late, the late hemorrhaging of the Carter administration, emerging of the Carter Administration, and this was followed by the signing of the Department of Education Organization Act, signed by the aforementioned Mr President, jimmy Carter, on October 7, 1979.

00:01:56.646 --> 00:02:00.453
However, the history of federal involvement in education dates back much, much further.

00:02:00.453 --> 00:02:09.503
In 1867, president Andrew Johnson, horrible president, signed legislation creating the first Department of Education.

00:02:09.503 --> 00:02:12.992
That wasn't the only wrong thing he did during his presidency.

00:02:12.992 --> 00:02:20.682
And then, in 1868, due to concerns about federal control over local schools, it was demoted to an Office of Education.

00:02:20.682 --> 00:02:24.735
This is an important nugget of wisdom to remember.

00:02:24.735 --> 00:02:39.610
We need to learn about the United States after the Civil War to understand why there were severe apprehensions for federal control over local schools Over the next century.

00:02:39.610 --> 00:03:02.266
From 1868, this office operated under various titles and was housed in different agencies, including the Department of Interior, the Department of Health and Education and Welfare, and in the 1950s and 60s, federal funding for education expanded significantly due to various social and political factors.

00:03:02.266 --> 00:03:06.895
So what were these key factors for increasing federal funding?

00:03:06.895 --> 00:03:13.555
Well, several key factors happened and some of them were actually correct.

00:03:14.276 --> 00:03:25.912
The Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union was a major driver of increased federal education, or increased federal investment in education.

00:03:25.912 --> 00:03:36.490
The launch of Sputnik 1 by the Soviet Union in 1957 created a whole sense of urgency for the United States to improve science and technology education.

00:03:36.490 --> 00:03:47.903
It actually led to a passage of the National Defense Education Act, which is kind of a big deal in education circles, called the NDEA.

00:03:47.903 --> 00:03:50.770
That was passed in 1958.

00:03:50.770 --> 00:04:05.572
It marked a beginning of large-scale federal involvement in education and primarily, education was at that time viewed as essential for national security, for economic growth and for social mobility.

00:04:05.572 --> 00:04:17.216
The NDEA tried to improve American schools and promote post-secondary education.

00:04:17.216 --> 00:04:27.048
Its aim was to strengthen all levels of the American school system and encourage students to continue their education beyond high school.

00:04:27.048 --> 00:04:35.613
Now, this was all good and wonderful statements from the NDEA, but often the devil is in the details.

00:04:35.613 --> 00:04:43.434
So, along with this federal increase of funding for schools, there was many, many strings attached to them.

00:04:43.434 --> 00:04:49.264
For schools, there was many, many strings attached to them.

00:04:49.283 --> 00:04:54.697
The United States sees a vast expansion of teacher unions during the 1960s, after the signing of this NDEA.

00:04:54.697 --> 00:04:58.244
Now there was a growth continuing in the 1970s of teacher unions.

00:04:58.244 --> 00:05:05.115
This period marked a huge turning point for teacher organization and union membership.

00:05:05.115 --> 00:05:16.350
So our third question is did teacher unions begin to be a big thing and how did it really affect the students?

00:05:16.350 --> 00:05:37.617
Well, yes, it actually did become a big thing because at the onset the United Federation of Teachers, the UFT, in New York City, spearheaded their movement in 1960 with a successful strike that led to collective bargaining rights by 1963.

00:05:37.617 --> 00:05:47.634
That, in addition to the American Federation of Teachers, the AFT, a different union group all along, experienced rapid growth.

00:05:47.634 --> 00:06:10.928
They expanded from fewer than 60,000 members in 1960 to wait for it over 200,000 by the end of the decade, and furthermore there was over 300 teacher strikes occurred throughout the country during the 10 years following the teacher strike in New York City, united Federation of Teachers' initial walkout.

00:06:10.928 --> 00:06:22.403
So our fourth question is these unions just kept growing and growing and began to smother out exactly how they were helping students Essentially?

00:06:22.403 --> 00:06:43.050
Yes, how they were helping students Essentially, yes, there was inspiration for private sector unionism and civil rights activism, for teacher unions to collectively bargain and gather, which is certainly within their constitutional rights.

00:06:44.220 --> 00:06:51.473
The AFT's abandonment of its no-strike pledge emboldened many teachers nationwide to strike.

00:06:51.473 --> 00:07:02.252
There was a passage of the law in 1961, the Brown Act in California, which granted public employees the right to join employee organizations.

00:07:02.252 --> 00:07:18.834
And then there was increasing numbers of men entering the teaching profession, which was kind of unheard of at the time and that often brought heightened militancy and expectations for better wages for all teachers.

00:07:18.834 --> 00:07:28.855
So our fifth question is how big did these unions get and did they keep striking, which was prohibitive to student learning?

00:07:28.855 --> 00:07:36.394
Well, yes, the momentum continued in the 1970s for teacher union expansion.

00:07:36.394 --> 00:07:52.266
Between 1960 and June of 1974, the country experienced over 1,000 teacher strikes involving more than 823,000 teachers by the end of the 1970s.

00:07:52.266 --> 00:07:57.600
Collective bargaining agreements covered 72% of public school teachers.

00:07:57.600 --> 00:08:23.757
The surge in teacher unionism affected both major teacher organizations the AFT, which grew rapidly and became very militant, and then the National Education Association, which was traditionally more conservative, was forced to adopt union-like tactics to compete and eventually to become a full-fledged union themselves.

00:08:23.757 --> 00:08:26.678
To compete and eventually to become a full-fledged union themselves.

00:08:28.879 --> 00:08:52.399
Now, if you want to go deeper into what was happening in the 50s and 60s in the education field, please check out our two-part series Liberty, minute 14, the 16,000-Hour War all about what happened at the beginning of the century and how the education system, our federal Department of Education, has failed us at every decade throughout the whole 20th century and going into the 21st century.

00:08:52.399 --> 00:08:57.451
We'll put links in the show notes for that very long two-part series there.

00:08:57.451 --> 00:08:59.563
So back to our questions.

00:08:59.563 --> 00:09:07.361
What other factors played into federal funding of education and how do we get a federal Department of Education that was so large?

00:09:07.361 --> 00:09:13.653
Well, in 1965, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was passed.

00:09:13.653 --> 00:09:20.793
It launched comprehensive programs, including Title I aid for disadvantaged children Good thing.

00:09:20.793 --> 00:09:30.434
And then the Higher Education Act of 1965 authorized assistance for post-secondary education, including financial aid for needy college students.

00:09:32.139 --> 00:09:42.304
Finally, in 1979, president Carter advocated and successfully established the Modern Department of Education as a cabinet-level agency, like we'd said before.

00:09:42.304 --> 00:10:08.658
Now, it's worth noting that while the department began with 3,000 employees in a $12 billion budget in 1980, it has since grown massively to as of 2024, it employs 4,400 people and it has a budget of an astounding $238 billion with a B.

00:10:08.658 --> 00:10:13.647
It's an annual budget, $238 billion with a B.

00:10:13.647 --> 00:10:18.726
So what is the answer?

00:10:18.726 --> 00:10:25.974
How do we conduct real reform of our education, all of our education, kindergarten through universities?

00:10:25.974 --> 00:10:32.245
Well, to answer that question, we're going to turn to our book of the day, and it's an old book.

00:10:32.245 --> 00:10:49.384
It's still an effective book, though, because the roots of all these problems were addressed, were pulled apart and completely addressed by the 1990s, were pulled apart and completely addressed by the 1990s.

00:10:49.403 --> 00:10:54.693
Ronald Reagan came in in 1981 with the sole goal of abolishing, on his domestic front, abolishing the Department of Education.

00:10:54.693 --> 00:10:56.744
They were never able to get it done.

00:10:56.744 --> 00:11:02.984
Many Senate Republicans balked at it and pushed back, and they simply did not have the votes.

00:11:02.984 --> 00:11:11.390
It took a lot of time and there was not a lot of bang for the buck, so to speak, in the Reagan administration to abolish that department.

00:11:11.390 --> 00:11:23.533
Bill Bennett, former education secretary under Reagan, details all of this in numerous books and podcasts.

00:11:24.620 --> 00:11:31.227
But our book of the day is going to be Thomas Sowell's Inside the American Education System, written back in 1993.

00:11:31.227 --> 00:11:34.234
But again, it's still effective today.

00:11:34.234 --> 00:11:40.212
It offers several critiques and suggestions for reforming the American education system.

00:11:40.212 --> 00:11:52.235
All have never been fully tried, but particularly there's two that would go a long way to reforming everything in our education system.

00:11:52.235 --> 00:11:55.650
They are teacher credentialing and tenure.

00:11:55.650 --> 00:12:08.245
So for our first quote of our day from the book of the day, rather, let's go to Inside American Education by Thomas Sowell, fantastic author.

00:12:10.402 --> 00:12:26.533
By their virtual monopoly on the credentialing process, schools and departments of education determine the caliber of people who enter the teaching profession, and the inadequacies of those people determine the upper limit of the quality of American education.

00:12:26.533 --> 00:13:04.970
Just as it is not the mere failure of education courses to provide adequate training that is crucial to the low intellectual quality of teachers, but rather the perverse filtering function these courses perform, so it is not the low academic skills of these teachers which are so damaging in the schools, but rather the historically demonstrable and pervasive tendencies of teachers and administrators alike to seek non-academic roles and functions for themselves and the schools.

00:13:04.970 --> 00:13:10.836
So these education departments at many of these universities.

00:13:10.836 --> 00:13:19.952
They have the monopoly on teacher credentialing and that system just fails to produce high-quality educators.

00:13:19.952 --> 00:13:22.201
I mean.

00:13:22.201 --> 00:13:30.274
Sol notes throughout the book merely meeting educational benchmarks set by states or district does not guarantee classroom success.

00:13:30.274 --> 00:13:38.803
But that monopoly is so restrictive that no one is able to offer any guidance on how to reform it.

00:13:38.803 --> 00:13:50.775
He advocates destroying the monopoly of education departments in teacher credentialing wholesale and I think that starts with abolishing the Department of Education.

00:13:50.775 --> 00:14:03.274
You're going to get much more success pushing out the years.

00:14:03.274 --> 00:14:22.090
If of those 50 states, let's say 10 or 15 have failing grades by any objective measure, that will be a greater plus, a greater advantage for the remaining 40 or 35 states.

00:14:22.090 --> 00:14:25.878
That is how bad the education system is nationwide.

00:14:27.066 --> 00:14:29.231
Let's go back to the book about abolishing tenure.

00:14:29.231 --> 00:14:30.956
What does Thomas Sowell say about that?

00:14:30.956 --> 00:14:48.755
The claim that tenure is essential to academic freedom is belied by the experience of think tanks staffed by scholars very similar to professors, people whose writings are at least as non-conformist and controversial as those of tenured faculty members.

00:14:48.755 --> 00:14:55.125
The belief that tenure simply cannot be gotten rid of is belied by the experience of Britain.

00:14:55.125 --> 00:15:05.638
Where it has been gotten rid of Stability of employment is not without its benefits to the institution as well as the individual.

00:15:05.638 --> 00:15:33.509
Other organizations recognize that with multi-year contracts or with customs which accomplish the same thing informally, there's no reason why colleges and universities could not extend their current practice of offering multi-year contracts from the junior faculty to the senior faculty, varying the length of these contracts according to the individual and their financial commitments of the institution.

00:15:33.509 --> 00:15:56.599
Many current faculty abuses, including the gross neglect of the students themselves, reflect an arrogance and an irresponsibility to which ironclad job security is the institutional foundation, and that institutional foundation needs to be destroyed.

00:15:58.147 --> 00:16:00.857
Ride on, ride on, thomas Sowell.

00:16:00.857 --> 00:16:01.822
Keep going, preach, baby, preach.

00:16:01.822 --> 00:16:02.043
I'm a soul.

00:16:02.043 --> 00:16:05.047
Keep going, preach, baby, preach.

00:16:05.047 --> 00:16:10.894
So again, soul strongly supports the elimination of tenure in these educational institutions.

00:16:10.894 --> 00:16:18.062
Often tenure protects underperforming teachers, leads to a huge lack of accountability.

00:16:18.062 --> 00:16:22.725
We've seen that for over 50 to 70 years.

00:16:22.725 --> 00:16:34.815
Soul states again as long as people are rewarded for just being alive a certain number of years, regardless of their performance, we cannot expect better quality outcomes.

00:16:34.815 --> 00:16:37.116
Absolutely right.

00:16:37.116 --> 00:16:44.802
He suggests that abolishing tenure would be a crucial step in improving the education system.

00:16:44.802 --> 00:16:48.365
Would be a crucial step in improving the education system.

00:16:48.365 --> 00:16:53.850
Now some other reforms in addition to addressing teacher credentialing and tenure.

00:16:53.850 --> 00:16:59.270
Soul proposes some other reforms implementing school choice to allow parents to remove their children from low-performing schools.

00:16:59.270 --> 00:17:01.884
Again, this book was written in 1993.

00:17:01.884 --> 00:17:18.517
This is probably the only place where we've made a lot of educational reform, despite what the educational establishment always said, and this starts back in the 1990s when I was in graduating from high school.

00:17:19.566 --> 00:17:20.268
Let's go to the book.

00:17:20.268 --> 00:17:23.296
All About School Choice, and what does Thomas Sowell say about that.

00:17:23.296 --> 00:17:28.244
All about school choice, and what does Thomas Sowell say about that?

00:17:28.244 --> 00:17:37.657
Finally, the most under-founded claim or unfounded claim rather, of all is that parental choice plans would be costlier than the present public school education.

00:17:37.657 --> 00:17:45.157
In reality, the average cost of educating students in private schools is less than the cost of educating them in public schools.

00:17:45.157 --> 00:17:48.775
The Catholic schools tend to be especially low cost.

00:17:48.775 --> 00:17:56.358
In Oakland, california, for example, the Catholic schools spend only about one-third as much per pupil as the public schools in the same city.

00:17:56.358 --> 00:17:58.791
I think that still holds true today.

00:17:58.791 --> 00:18:12.011
I was teaching CCD in the early 2000s, 2005-ish to 2010, and this stat was the same, at least in the Columbus Catholic schools.

00:18:14.188 --> 00:18:14.730
Back to the book.

00:18:14.730 --> 00:18:19.375
It has been commonplace for private schools to produce better education for less money.

00:18:19.375 --> 00:18:29.400
Yep, the opposition of the educational establishment to school choice proposals has not been limited to presenting arguments.

00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:43.365
They also have used their political muscle to get choice plans scaled back, underfinanced and encumbered with red tape where they have been unable to stop such plans completely.

00:18:43.365 --> 00:18:46.054
That is absolutely, without a doubt, true.

00:18:46.054 --> 00:18:59.019
For example, almost never do such plans for parental choice allow the student who transfers out of the system to take along as much money as the system spends per pupil.

00:18:59.019 --> 00:19:20.766
Having done as much as possible to cripple the choice actually offered to the parents, the educational establishment then points triumphantly to the fact that parents have not been as enthusiastic for the shriveled options presented to them as choice advocates have suggested when advocating a full-bodied set of options.

00:19:20.766 --> 00:19:41.183
A full-bodied set of options, moreover and here's where the national education system is just absolutely very, very bad they are not in the student's best interest.

00:19:44.285 --> 00:19:48.027
The National Education Association engages in tricky manipulation of statistics in order to understate how much use is made of parental choice.

00:19:48.027 --> 00:20:03.307
Although the whole point of allowing parental choice is to permit a selection among schools, the NEA measures the usage of such choice by how many transfers place out of the school district.

00:20:03.307 --> 00:20:08.009
Obviously, few parents are going to send their children great distances from home.

00:20:08.009 --> 00:20:19.710
But the NEA tricky statistics conceal how many transfers among schools and students actually happen within the district.

00:20:19.710 --> 00:20:28.816
So again, school choice has significantly expanded.

00:20:28.816 --> 00:20:39.442
In the 1990s and that's when this book was written More families were opting for alternatives to traditionally assigned public schools.

00:20:39.442 --> 00:20:46.607
The most increase in school choice has occurred within the public school system.

00:20:46.607 --> 00:20:54.699
Percentage of students attending their assigned public schools decreased from 80% in 1993 to 69% in 2016.

00:20:54.699 --> 00:20:55.640
It's a big drop.

00:20:55.640 --> 00:21:08.924
Conversely, enrollment in chosen public schools, including charter schools, increased from 11% in 1993 to 19% in 2016.

00:21:08.924 --> 00:21:17.698
These are outside statistics because again, the NEA likes to play tricky with the numbers.

00:21:17.718 --> 00:21:20.325
Charter schools, another alternative in the public school choice debate.

00:21:20.325 --> 00:21:21.386
They have seen remarkable growth.

00:21:21.386 --> 00:21:26.157
In fall of 2000, only 0.4 million students were enrolled in charter schools.

00:21:26.157 --> 00:21:34.619
By the fall of 2016, this number has surged to 3 million students, representing a seven-fold increase.

00:21:34.619 --> 00:21:44.855
Now other areas of educational choice have seen progress since the 1990s Voucher programs and educational savings accounts.

00:21:44.855 --> 00:22:02.782
Since the 1990s voucher programs and educational savings accounts the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program established in the 1990 was one of the first modern voucher programs and was really the first crack in this school choice fight.

00:22:02.782 --> 00:22:12.453
Throughout the 2000s and 2010, many states have implemented various school choice initiatives, including vouchers and tax credit scholarship programs.

00:22:12.453 --> 00:22:17.016
Recent years we've seen the creation of more expansive programs.

00:22:17.016 --> 00:22:22.349
West Virginia State Education Savings Account Program just passed in 2021.

00:22:22.390 --> 00:22:28.059
That, I'm hearing, is wonderful to get your kids out of the failing schools.

00:22:28.059 --> 00:22:31.914
And then private school enrollment has remained relatively stable.

00:22:31.914 --> 00:22:36.194
Many parents feel that private schools are doing a pretty good job.

00:22:36.194 --> 00:22:39.595
They're staying on task with providing good education.

00:22:39.595 --> 00:22:47.204
Homeschooling is where we have seen a lot of popularity.

00:22:47.204 --> 00:23:00.292
The percentage of homeschooled students increased from 2% in 1999 to 3% in 2016, but many more actual students are getting schooled at home.

00:23:00.292 --> 00:23:05.132
Um, so those numbers are kind of tricky.

00:23:05.132 --> 00:23:25.579
Just a mere 1% increase of the total number of students is substantial and frankly, I've taught many homeschool kids in religious education at my parish, like I said, from 2005 to 2010 when I was doing it, and frankly they were more prepared and better behaved than some of the other kids.

00:23:28.046 --> 00:23:38.601
Now, some other ways states could improve education at their level introducing merit pay, merit-based pay and rigorous evaluation systems for teachers.

00:23:38.601 --> 00:23:40.811
That's what I think we should go to.

00:23:40.811 --> 00:24:00.048
Re-evaluating union policies to balance teacher rights with accountability absolutely needs to be there, and just in the cursory review of just this book Inside American Education.

00:24:00.048 --> 00:24:05.338
I came across a review of the book and I just thought this was profound.

00:24:05.338 --> 00:24:13.028
This is from a former 36-year post-secondary teacher and here's what he writes.

00:24:13.028 --> 00:24:24.525
After reading Inside American Education, our book of the day, quote Dr Soule reveals what has been happening in the American classrooms since the 1960s.

00:24:24.525 --> 00:24:26.587
That's been happening in the American classrooms since the 1960s.

00:24:26.587 --> 00:24:34.098
After you read and understand his analysis, you don't have to wonder why American children are far behind the children of China, japan, south Korea, etc.

00:24:34.098 --> 00:24:39.567
In academic achievement and competence.

00:24:39.567 --> 00:24:43.877
He says I taught for 36 years in a post-secondary school.

00:24:43.877 --> 00:24:49.548
Taught for 36 years in a post-secondary school.

00:24:49.548 --> 00:24:53.679
The dramatic academic shortcomings of most of the high school graduates who came to our school were almost insurmountable.

00:24:53.679 --> 00:25:01.094
Insurmountable is what that former 36-year teacher says.

00:25:03.198 --> 00:25:04.299
Okay, two more questions.

00:25:04.299 --> 00:25:11.711
Back to our original question do we really need a federal department of education?

00:25:11.711 --> 00:25:18.367
I think the necessity of that education department, even though it's a topic of ongoing debate.

00:25:18.367 --> 00:25:22.178
I'm going to fall squarely into the Reagan camp on this one.

00:25:22.178 --> 00:25:27.030
Reagan, in his 1982 State of the Union address, called for the end of the department.

00:25:27.030 --> 00:25:32.990
He argued that the decisions regarding education should be made at the local level rather than the federal government.

00:25:32.990 --> 00:25:42.451
He thought it was a bureaucratic entity that interfered with more local control over educational matters, and I happen to agree with him.

00:25:42.451 --> 00:25:50.390
And despite, like I said, calls for abolition, congress ultimately did not support this move.

00:25:50.390 --> 00:25:55.626
Bob Dole was one of the proponents pushing back against Reagan.

00:25:55.626 --> 00:25:58.576
He was Senate Majority Leader at the time.

00:26:00.160 --> 00:26:03.788
Yes, the Reagan administration reduced the department's influence and its budget.

00:26:03.788 --> 00:26:09.819
It cut its funding and regulatory authority, but Reagan was unable to eliminate it entirely.

00:26:09.819 --> 00:26:14.394
Two reasons you could abolish this department.

00:26:14.394 --> 00:26:28.919
You could remove it as a cabinet level position and you could bend it into the Department of Health and Human Services, where it existed for most of the history of our country, at least since the 1870s.

00:26:28.919 --> 00:26:39.215
So then, that begs the question okay, could you just demote it to a much smaller department so the education funding stays in the states?

00:26:39.215 --> 00:26:40.809
Yes, you could.

00:26:42.366 --> 00:26:49.832
Two reasons for having a much, much smaller federal department of education instead of eliminating it altogether.

00:26:49.832 --> 00:26:59.586
If you can't eliminate it altogether, two reasons for having a much smaller department is number one you do need to account for civil rights enforcement.

00:26:59.586 --> 00:27:08.039
The department enforces civil rights laws in education, ensuring that schools do not discriminate based on race, gender or disability.

00:27:08.039 --> 00:27:17.819
This enforcement is vital because it maintains a quality of educational opportunities.

00:27:17.819 --> 00:27:26.900
It administers programs like Title I, like we said, and that involves a lot of disability education initiatives.

00:27:26.900 --> 00:27:32.316
So students with disabilities we would have to protect as a carve-out.

00:27:32.316 --> 00:27:35.472
But we don't need a whole federal department to do it.

00:27:35.472 --> 00:27:41.278
It could be part of another federal department and just have a much smaller scale.

00:27:41.278 --> 00:27:54.038
Number two the department is responsible for collecting and analyzing educational data which helps inform policy decisions at federal and state levels.

00:27:54.038 --> 00:28:08.038
I think this research could really be accomplished much more efficiently to help identify trends and challenges in education, help to guide the funding and help to guide program development, all at a state level.

00:28:08.038 --> 00:28:15.618
I think you could be much more efficient than just having us fund paper pushers in Washington DC.

00:28:15.618 --> 00:28:23.193
So most of this funding can be pushed back to the states as block grants or, frankly, just remain in the states.

00:28:23.193 --> 00:28:29.044
Grants or, frankly, just remain in the states.

00:28:29.104 --> 00:28:33.356
Okay, in terms of the final arguments, our 10th question what are the final arguments against the Federal Department of Education?

00:28:33.356 --> 00:28:35.791
Well, there's two, two major ones.

00:28:35.791 --> 00:28:48.555
There's a constitutional concern Education is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, suggesting that the founders thought it should be managed at state or local level rather than federally.

00:28:48.555 --> 00:28:55.616
You know, I believe this goes along with the principle of subsidiarity.

00:28:55.616 --> 00:29:06.837
I'm a huge believer in that principle, where local governments should handle the issues and the education of their students much more effectively than Washington DC can.

00:29:08.285 --> 00:29:10.332
Number two bureaucracy and inefficiency.

00:29:10.332 --> 00:29:14.846
The education department creates unnecessary bureaucracy.

00:29:14.846 --> 00:29:19.134
They hinder educational innovation and responsiveness.

00:29:19.134 --> 00:29:20.898
That happens at local level.

00:29:20.898 --> 00:29:29.932
States are much better suited to address their unique educational needs without federal oversight.

00:29:29.932 --> 00:29:42.932
Just as an example, there's 512,000 principals and other administrators at elementary school and secondary schools.

00:29:42.932 --> 00:29:53.365
There's 97,000 administrators at child and daycare providers and there's 58,000 administrators at trade schools and other educational service providers.

00:29:53.365 --> 00:29:58.999
Again, it's another reason for the principle of subsidiarity.

00:29:58.999 --> 00:30:10.720
If your local school board or your local department of education the state level has too many administrators with no oversight, that's the fault of your local population.

00:30:10.720 --> 00:30:12.631
You're going to know these people.

00:30:12.631 --> 00:30:24.553
Frankly, you should be attending your local school boards and ask the questions that are relevant why does this person have this job and what is this position for?

00:30:24.553 --> 00:30:36.536
If they can't provide you an answer, then they should be criticized and possibly be run against in the next school board election.

00:30:36.536 --> 00:30:49.971
Local control of our government is why our country is still one of the main reasons this country has flourished and why we are a fantastic country, best in the history of the world.

00:30:52.201 --> 00:31:06.893
Now, the counterargument to this and it wasn't made great during the Reconstruction, when free blacks and former slaves and their children were not afforded educational opportunities.

00:31:06.893 --> 00:31:08.244
He's absolutely correct.

00:31:08.244 --> 00:31:10.326
There's no argument here for that.

00:31:10.326 --> 00:31:14.849
So that's when it does become a federal issue.

00:31:14.849 --> 00:31:21.147
But we don't need to have a permanent federal department in Washington DC making these decisions.

00:31:21.147 --> 00:31:28.606
We need correct oversight from Congress, who has the power to pressure to ensure there is no discrimination happening.

00:31:28.606 --> 00:31:38.127
Outside of that, very strong governors and strong state legislatures can weed out and expose that corruption for what it is.

00:31:38.127 --> 00:31:41.181
We don't need a federal department of education.

00:31:41.181 --> 00:31:42.382
We might.

00:31:42.382 --> 00:31:58.692
We may have needed it at the time from 1865, probably through the end of the century, if we were actually good, if we had a good Congress at the time, if we had strong leadership in the White House.

00:31:58.692 --> 00:32:00.032
But we didn't.

00:32:00.032 --> 00:32:12.029
We went through Reconstruction, we went through the Jim Crow South, which lasted another 100 years because of just weak leadership at a congressional and presidential level.

00:32:12.029 --> 00:32:16.528
So we have two bonus questions.

00:32:16.528 --> 00:32:23.951
First bonus question, and it has to be asked again what's the deal regarding teacher union membership?

00:32:23.951 --> 00:32:34.528
And it has to be asked again what's the deal regarding teacher union membership, most especially what happened since the 1960s, because something just seems wrong from the outside.

00:32:34.528 --> 00:32:35.088
And you're absolutely right.

00:32:35.108 --> 00:32:41.146
Teacher union membership in the United States has significantly increased from the 1960s until now.

00:32:41.146 --> 00:32:53.721
Like we said before, the AFT grew from 60,000 members in 1960 to over 200,000 members by the end of the decade Now.

00:32:53.721 --> 00:32:57.151
Teacher union membership reached its peak in the late 2000s.

00:32:57.151 --> 00:33:12.791
By 2008, the combined membership of the AFT and the National Education Association approached $4 million, and they had annual revenues at all levels to be estimated at nearly $2 billion.

00:33:13.753 --> 00:33:22.885
Now, since the late 2000s, the percentage of public school teachers who are union members has dropped significantly.

00:33:22.885 --> 00:33:25.211
That is going in the right direction.

00:33:25.211 --> 00:33:38.750
Federal data shows that 85% of public school teachers were union members in 1990, falling to 79% in 1999, and then to 68% by 2020.

00:33:38.750 --> 00:34:01.180
Another good trend Now, despite the overall decline, teacher unions still represent a significant portion of the workforce, and that workforce is more militant now than they were as of 2024, approximately 20% of union members in the country are public school teachers.

00:34:02.021 --> 00:34:08.514
The NEA reported 2.4 million working members in 2021-2022 year.

00:34:08.514 --> 00:34:22.273
That's down 40,000 for the previous year, but still, while membership has decreased, teacher unions remain a very powerful force in education policy and labor activism.

00:34:22.273 --> 00:34:31.686
We've seen a resurgence in teacher strikes and increased public support for educator organization, and that's a bad thing.

00:34:31.686 --> 00:34:41.329
Now there's huge reasons in the last decade, and especially since COVID, for private schools, for charter schools or for homeschooling.

00:34:41.329 --> 00:34:44.148
We need to continue to push that.

00:34:44.148 --> 00:34:48.282
That's the competition we need Now.

00:34:48.282 --> 00:34:56.753
Our next bonus question, final bonus question have we ever abolished entire federal departments of anything before in the history of the United States?

00:34:56.960 --> 00:35:01.570
Yes we've abolished many entire federal departments before.

00:35:01.570 --> 00:35:14.766
In the history of the United States Don't let the major media lie to you there's been many instances where cabinet level positions or entire departments have been abolished or significantly restructured.

00:35:14.766 --> 00:35:27.137
Here's some examples the Agricultural Adjustment Administration the AAA, founded in 1933 to regulate agricultural production, it was abolished in 1942.

00:35:27.137 --> 00:35:36.855
The Civil Aeronautics Board, the CAB, established in 1938 to oversee civil aviation, it was abolished in 1985.

00:35:36.855 --> 00:35:42.648
Department of War Department of War existed from 1789.

00:35:42.648 --> 00:35:46.655
It was renamed the Department of the Army in 1947.

00:35:48.121 --> 00:35:50.469
The Healthcare Financing Administration HICFA.

00:35:50.469 --> 00:35:57.099
This agency managed Medicare and Medicaid.

00:35:57.099 --> 00:36:05.114
It was replaced by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare in 2001 and went through an overhaul.

00:36:05.114 --> 00:36:17.434
Immigration and Naturalization Service it was folded into and reorganized in 2003 as the Department of Homeland Security.

00:36:17.434 --> 00:36:22.791
The Office of Technology Assessment OTA.

00:36:22.791 --> 00:36:28.782
Office of Technology Assessment, ota.

00:36:28.782 --> 00:36:32.449
This agency provided technology assessments to Congress until it was abolished in 2004.

00:36:32.449 --> 00:36:44.469
Now the United States Information Agency it was established during the Cold War to promote public diplomacy and it was absorbed in the State Department in 1999.

00:36:44.469 --> 00:36:55.911
The Veterans Administration it was a cabinet-level department until 1988, and now it's the Department of Veteran Affairs.

00:36:58.181 --> 00:37:22.927
So there's been many changes and, frankly, the Department of Education was changed was formed in 1953 as a Department of Education and it was part of the Department of Health, education and Workfare, rather, and then it was spun off into its own department in 1979.

00:37:22.927 --> 00:37:28.842
So there's been many, many instances where we have abolished whole departments.

00:37:28.842 --> 00:37:32.050
So don't let anyone say that we've never done that before.

00:37:32.050 --> 00:37:47.574
Now, abolishing a federal department or agency in most cases requires an act of Congress, and often this faces significant political challenges, like our current era, where the current GOP has about as much spine as the old Whig Party.

00:37:47.574 --> 00:37:54.248
So we will see what will happen, but almost everything can be changed.

00:37:54.248 --> 00:37:57.409
What cannot be changed is the structure of our government.

00:37:57.409 --> 00:38:00.027
We will always have three branches of government.

00:38:01.701 --> 00:38:07.625
Americans cannot secede from the country, despite a lot of talk about doing so from the left and the right.

00:38:07.625 --> 00:38:12.480
Andrew Jackson said as much to South Carolina in the 1830s.

00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:14.143
He said you can't do that.

00:38:14.143 --> 00:38:20.079
And Abraham and Lincoln actually enforced that same message in 1861.

00:38:20.079 --> 00:38:32.233
And, frankly, the South started a civil war over that very question and in the process we resolve the original sin of slavery in the United States in the process of that war.

00:38:32.460 --> 00:38:44.132
So there are permanent things that will never be changed in the United States of America, but closing federal departments can and should be done from time to time.

00:38:44.132 --> 00:38:47.068
It's just like cleaning out your home closet or your garage.

00:38:47.068 --> 00:38:57.050
Sometimes you just need to take everything out and relook at everything you have once again, because there's a lot of trash that needs to be thrown out.

00:38:57.050 --> 00:39:23.065
So in today's special podcast on the need for a federal department of education, it would require much less effort and much less gnashing of teeth to fold this department into a department of health and human services, as we have done in prior Congresses, and especially when we're facing a $35 trillion debt.

00:39:23.065 --> 00:39:33.612
We might need a smaller, more robust Federal Department of Education, and that would be good for the whole federal government.

00:39:33.612 --> 00:39:42.168
We might need it to ensure we don't have discrimination and that all disadvantaged youth are getting their educational needs met.

00:39:42.168 --> 00:39:49.487
But the rest of the Department of Education monies can be block-granted back to the states or, frankly, just remain in the states.

00:39:50.201 --> 00:39:53.751
For my sake, I don't think we need a federal Department of Education.

00:39:53.751 --> 00:39:56.027
I'm all about abolishing it.

00:39:56.027 --> 00:40:17.012
I have faith in the people and the states blue and red to better care for the education of their citizens and for watchdog groups to monitor these states, their educational policies and those people with closer eyes on those specific states than the vast government bureaucracy in Washington DC.

00:40:17.012 --> 00:40:22.710
Frankly, I much prefer the competition between the states.

00:40:22.710 --> 00:40:28.192
We've seen that in other areas, notably in COVID, enforcement and pushback.

00:40:28.192 --> 00:40:46.081
Stronger governments and stronger state legislatures will provide much better leadership with better ideas, with better outcomes, with more effective government than Washington DC can, and that, folks, is how the founders of the country would have wanted it.

00:40:46.081 --> 00:40:53.054
Those closest to the problems are those best suited to fix the problems.

00:40:53.054 --> 00:40:59.251
So I thank you for listening and, as always, let's keep fighting the good fight.

00:41:03.440 --> 00:41:04.682
Thank you for joining us.

00:41:04.682 --> 00:41:08.090
We hope you enjoyed this theory to action podcast.

00:41:08.090 --> 00:41:17.262
Be sure to check out our show page at team mojo academycom, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast, as well as other great resources.

00:41:17.262 --> 00:41:21.085
Until next time, keep getting your mojo on.

SPECIAL MM#372--Do We Need a Federal Dept. of Education?

Listen On

Recent Episodes