SPECIAL -- MM#367 -- Radical Democrats Playing Dirty Pool

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:07.612 --> 00:00:20.807
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:20.807 --> 00:00:24.907
Now here's your host, david Kaiser.

00:00:25.489 --> 00:00:50.539
Hello, I am David and welcome back to a special 2024 Mojo Minute, and we are just one just a little over one week past the 2024 presidential election and Donald Trump is beginning what could be a major realignment in American politics Not seen since 1932.

00:00:50.539 --> 00:01:04.147
But we wanted to bring you this 2024 election special because down ballot, things are getting a little spicy, I guess, is how we're going to describe it.

00:01:04.147 --> 00:01:06.403
Are getting a little spicy, I guess, is how we're going to describe it.

00:01:06.403 --> 00:01:20.072
Down ballot, radical Democrats have their most precious election lawyer on the move and we believe, as always, we're about to see radical Democrats playing some dirty pool.

00:01:20.072 --> 00:01:36.688
Based on a quick research results yesterday morning, it appears that Democrat election lawyer Mark Elias is indeed involved in the 2024 Pennsylvania Senate race, though right now his exact role is still developing.

00:01:36.688 --> 00:01:48.748
Here is what we can gather Elias has publicly commented on the race over this past weekend, stating on social media the Pennsylvania race is not over more soon.

00:01:48.748 --> 00:01:54.893
This does suggest that he's taking active interest in the outcome of that Senate seat.

00:01:55.840 --> 00:02:02.750
Elias is working with Kamala Harris's campaign to raise funds for a potential recount in the Pennsylvania Senate race.

00:02:02.750 --> 00:02:12.949
Race was called for Republican Dave McCormick, but incumbent Robert or Democrat incumbent, bob Casey, has not yet conceded.

00:02:12.949 --> 00:02:29.348
Elias's involvement seems to be primarily focused on the recount or challenging the election results, and he is known for his work in election law and post-election litigation for a prethla of Democratic candidates.

00:02:29.348 --> 00:02:32.949
Now there is some controversy surrounding this involvement.

00:02:32.949 --> 00:02:46.810
Critics argue that Casey's lead is too large to be overcome, or rather that McCormick's lead is too large to be overcome, so we're not sure how this is going to work out.

00:02:46.810 --> 00:02:59.592
The Republican Senatorial Committee has called for Bob Casey to concede, criticizing the involvement of Elias, describing it as pushing a big lie.

00:02:59.592 --> 00:03:09.713
It's important to note the situation is still developing and Elias' exact role and to extent of his involvement may change as events unfold.

00:03:09.713 --> 00:03:20.376
But as we say all of this, I'm a political junkie, so I wanted to share with you that we have seen this movie play out before.

00:03:21.361 --> 00:03:22.848
Now, first, who is Mark Elias?

00:03:22.848 --> 00:03:36.352
If you're not a political junkie or a political nerd like me, you probably don't know who he is, but Mark Elias is a prominent American attorney who has become one of the most important legal figures for the Democratic Party.

00:03:36.352 --> 00:03:53.561
Many people are now familiar with George Soros and his funding of radical causes and supporting radical prosecutors, most of which are finally getting voted out of office, thankfully, after wrecking major havoc and destruction on the legal community for the last decade.

00:03:53.561 --> 00:04:02.906
Plus, you can check out Liberty Minute 11, where we did a deep dive into George Soros and his legal shenanigans.

00:04:02.906 --> 00:04:15.373
So Mark Elias comes from that similar camp, particularly in matters of election law, voting rights and campaign finance, and here's why he is significant.

00:04:16.620 --> 00:04:30.968
He's handled hundreds of cases involving politics, voting rights, redistricting and successfully arguing four cases before the US Supreme Court and dozens more in state Supreme Courts and US Courts of Appeals.

00:04:30.968 --> 00:04:43.625
He was general counsel for several high-profile Democratic presidential campaigns Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign, john Kerry in 2004, and, obviously, kamala Harris in 2020.

00:04:43.625 --> 00:04:49.975
He's also represented numerous US senators, governors, representatives and other Democratic organizations.

00:04:49.975 --> 00:04:55.250
In fact, he played a crucial role in the 2020 election cycle.

00:04:55.250 --> 00:05:02.673
He led over 150 voting rights cases in 30 states, winning more than 120 of them.

00:05:02.673 --> 00:05:12.771
Now, please note, over half of these cases were dismissed on procedural grounds, not on substance of the litigants' claims.

00:05:12.771 --> 00:05:14.665
That's an important note.

00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:22.649
Now, elias has been at the forefront of these efforts to expand voting access and challenge what Democrats view as restrictive voting laws.

00:05:22.649 --> 00:05:39.247
What Democrats view as restrictive voting laws, particularly, his lawsuits all in 2020, evolved around the expanded mail-in voting that we saw and other voting options during the COVID-19 pandemic, and that's very, very suspect.

00:05:39.247 --> 00:05:55.235
In 2021, as Republican-dominated state legislatures passed new election laws, elias was on the forefront again, filing lawsuit after lawsuit challenging these laws, often within hours of the bills actually being signed.

00:05:55.235 --> 00:06:08.002
Now, in 2021, he left his position at Perkins Coie to start his own law firm, the Elias Law Group Cohen to start his own law firm.

00:06:08.002 --> 00:06:11.291
The Elias Law Group Continues to be a key figure in democratic legal strategy, particularly in election law matters.

00:06:11.291 --> 00:06:20.934
He recently founded the Democracy Docket, a leading digital platform focused on voting rights and election litigation.

00:06:22.021 --> 00:06:33.170
So that's his background, but the case where things got very weird and in fact, some just say very bizarre happened way back in 2008.

00:06:33.170 --> 00:06:41.750
And thus the reason why we're calling this Special Mojo Minute Democrats' Dirty Pool.

00:06:41.750 --> 00:07:00.069
Because in 2008, mark Elias played a crucial role in the 2008 Minnesota US Senate election, representing Democratic candidate Al Franken in what became one of the longest, most contentious recounts in all of American electoral history.

00:07:00.069 --> 00:07:09.600
Here's a brief summary Elias served as the head of Al Franken's legal team during the recount and subsequent legal battle.

00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:25.857
When the initial count was completed on November 18, 2008, franken was still trailing incumbent Republican Senator Norm Coleman by 215 votes, which triggered a mandatory recount under Minnesota law.

00:07:25.857 --> 00:07:50.547
Elias led the legal efforts during this recount process, which involved monitoring the hand recount of some 2.9 million ballots across 120 locations in Minnesota Representative Franken's interest before the state canvassing board which made determinations on each challenged ballot.

00:07:50.547 --> 00:07:56.483
Then he appeared before the Minnesota Supreme Court on at least four occasions during the process.

00:07:57.627 --> 00:08:00.512
In fact, this case is documented in our book of the day.

00:08:00.512 --> 00:08:02.923
Its title is who's Counting?

00:08:02.923 --> 00:08:12.649
How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put your Vote at Risk, by John Fund and Hans von Sparkowski.

00:08:12.649 --> 00:08:20.201
Let's go to the book for our first pull quote More Minnesota funny business.

00:08:20.461 --> 00:08:39.298
Leaving aside felon voting and all the other irregularities, minnesota's majority fund found the recount of the Minnesota vote showed a pattern of double standards in counting and absentee balloting problems throughout, throwing the fairness and completeness of the entire process into doubt.

00:08:39.298 --> 00:08:57.225
After the initial count on election night, al Franken trailed Norm Coleman by 725 votes out of the 2.9 million cast, including approximately 300,000 absentee ballots.

00:08:57.225 --> 00:08:58.366
So actually let me correct my own.

00:08:58.366 --> 00:09:00.349
I said 215 votes, so that's bad research on mine.

00:09:00.349 --> 00:09:02.110
I'll defer to the book here.

00:09:02.110 --> 00:09:06.914
And 725 votes out of the 2.9 million cast.

00:09:06.914 --> 00:09:08.417
Back to the book.

00:09:08.417 --> 00:09:21.860
After the initial canvas, which is the process by which counties resubmit to the Secretary of State the vote totals of local precincts from election day, coleman's lead shrank to only 206 votes.

00:09:21.860 --> 00:09:25.054
Okay, so I was a little bit closer with my research.

00:09:25.054 --> 00:09:31.913
So the Democratic strategy focused on how to conduct the recount so that the votes could be added to Franken's total.

00:09:32.701 --> 00:09:47.193
The Franken legal team swarmed the recount aggressively, demanding that the votes that had been disqualified for failing to meet legal state requirements be added to his count, while others be denied to Coleman Democrats' dirty pull at work.

00:09:47.193 --> 00:09:54.923
The team's goldmine was the thousands of absentee ballots that the Franken team claimed had been mistakenly rejected.

00:09:54.923 --> 00:10:16.940
While Coleman's lawyers demanded a uniform standard for how counties should reevaluate these rejected ballots, the Franken legal team ginned up an additional 1,350 absentee ballots from Franken's leaning Democratic counties.

00:10:16.940 --> 00:10:26.390
By the time this treasure hunt ended, franken was up 312 votes and Coleman was left to file legal briefs to overturn that results.

00:10:26.390 --> 00:10:28.195
So let's stop right here.

00:10:28.195 --> 00:10:31.326
Here's the key political nugget of wisdom.

00:10:31.326 --> 00:10:42.520
The Franken legal team ginned up an additional 1,350 absentee ballots from Franken's leaning Democratic counties in Minnesota.

00:10:42.520 --> 00:10:48.331
Where did these 1,350 absentee ballots come from?

00:10:48.331 --> 00:10:55.951
That's the shenanigans we all want to look for, especially in this Pennsylvania Senate seat.

00:10:57.595 --> 00:10:58.155
Back to the book.

00:10:58.155 --> 00:11:06.615
Under Minnesota law, the only absentee ballots that should have been included in the recount were those that were actually cast in the election.

00:11:06.615 --> 00:11:18.769
As the state's Assistant Attorney General, keith Roshaki Jr, wrote to the Democratic Secretary of State Rishi on November 17, 2008,.

00:11:18.769 --> 00:11:24.620
Rejected absentee ballots are not considered as cast in an election.

00:11:24.620 --> 00:11:33.440
Only the ballots cast in the election and the summary statement certified by the election judges may be considered in the recount process.

00:11:33.440 --> 00:11:40.404
The Minnesota Code specifies in Section 204C.35, subsection 3.

00:11:40.404 --> 00:11:43.488
In section 204C.35, subsection 3.

00:11:43.508 --> 00:11:56.580
Now I will spare us all the back and forth as these arguments devolved into each side, detailing what was a counted ballot, what wasn't, what is absentee postmarks, whether or not.

00:11:56.580 --> 00:11:58.501
It's all detailed in the book.

00:11:58.501 --> 00:12:04.200
Be sure to check it out if you're interested.

00:12:04.200 --> 00:12:09.626
But this is how these things happen.

00:12:09.626 --> 00:12:24.475
When you don't count the early vote or the absentee vote before the actual vote starts, it's just a matter of finding out how many votes, what's the number of total votes you need to exceed, and they just go out and gin them up, they just print them off and they drop them in and say, oh, these are postmarked by the election day.

00:12:24.475 --> 00:12:26.642
A lot of shenanigans.

00:12:26.642 --> 00:12:32.136
We got to get this dialed in, but let's go back to the book and find out what happened back in 2008.

00:12:34.145 --> 00:12:45.471
There was no consistency in the board's determinations of the intent, other than that their inconsistent decisions overall seemed to benefit Al Franken.

00:12:45.471 --> 00:12:47.674
This is the state canvassing board.

00:12:47.674 --> 00:13:00.975
What Franken understood was that the courts would later be hostile to overruling decisions made by the canvassing board and local election officials, however arbitrary those decisions were.

00:13:00.975 --> 00:13:02.538
He was right.

00:13:02.538 --> 00:13:44.205
The three-judge panel overseeing the Coleman legal challenge in the Supreme Court that reviewed the panel's findings in essence found that Coleman hadn't demonstrated there was a willful or malicious attempt on behalf of officials to deny him the election, and so they refused to reopen what had been a forbidding tangle of irregularities, including reports of precincts where ballots may have been double counted during the manual recount and returns from one Minneapolis precinct in which some ballots were lost before the manual recount, minneapolis precinct in which some ballots were lost before the manual recount.

00:13:44.205 --> 00:13:56.445
One of the members of the Minnesota canvassing board admitted that there was quote a very good likelihood that there was double counting unquote, but dismissed it as a problem because, quote there was little or very little about it unquote.

00:13:56.445 --> 00:14:04.359
The board allowed those double votes to be included in the recount, and the courts refused to question that dubious decision.

00:14:06.125 --> 00:14:16.168
Coleman didn't lose the election so much as he lost the fight to stop the state canvassing board from changing the vote-counting rules after the ballots had been cast.

00:14:16.168 --> 00:14:26.664
The recount cost to both campaigns for legal fees, fundraising, staff and associated expenses was upwards of $20 million, which was an enormous sum.

00:14:26.664 --> 00:14:36.524
Now guess who was front and center of this whole charade in 2008 in Minnesota?

00:14:36.524 --> 00:14:40.977
You guessed it Our guy, mark Elias.

00:14:40.977 --> 00:14:49.241
Let's read from the book Coleman's lawyers not only lost the legal battle, they lost the technology battle.

00:14:49.929 --> 00:15:03.344
The system implemented by the Franken campaign lawyers to record and track all the disputed ballots was quite extensive, far beyond what the Coleman campaign did or what had been done in 2000 in Florida.

00:15:03.344 --> 00:15:16.063
According to Franken's lead attorney, listen, mark Elias, scanners, laptops and other mobile devices were used to record and keep track of every single disputed ballot in every county in Minnesota.

00:15:16.063 --> 00:15:31.177
Decisions made by local election boards on each ballot were immediately uploaded to a cloud database set up by the campaign so that Elias and his legal team knew exactly what vote totals were for each candidate across the state at every point in time.

00:15:31.177 --> 00:15:42.283
This gave them a tactical advantage over Coleman's legal team by providing them with information on when to object and not object in individual ballot disputes.

00:15:42.283 --> 00:15:52.902
As the Wall Street Journal editorialized at the time, after Franken's seating quote modern elections don't end when voters cast their ballots.

00:15:52.902 --> 00:16:01.288
They only end after the lawyers count them.

00:16:01.288 --> 00:16:13.514
Now we will certainly not dispute that.

00:16:13.533 --> 00:16:14.277
There are tactics, much like in sports.

00:16:14.277 --> 00:16:16.970
There are many tactics that run right up to the line of roles on who can do what on where and when and how.

00:16:16.970 --> 00:16:23.029
You know.

00:16:23.029 --> 00:16:26.576
For example, in football there's often a phrase said that you could call the holding penalty on the offense or the defense on every play.

00:16:26.576 --> 00:16:31.552
So it's a very technical term what is holding and how do you enforce that, how the officials force that.

00:16:31.552 --> 00:16:37.004
But there are times when it's so egregious that you have to throw the flag.

00:16:37.004 --> 00:16:39.932
That's what we're really talking about here.

00:16:41.094 --> 00:16:53.287
And when you just find randomly 1,350 absentee ballots out of nowhere, out of thin air, just because they missed a postmark date, that's egregious.

00:16:53.287 --> 00:16:54.876
It has to not be included.

00:16:54.876 --> 00:17:07.343
You have to follow the letter of the law, because the letter of the law is written by the representatives of the state legislature and that state legislature is there by the consent of the governed of that state.

00:17:07.343 --> 00:17:14.511
When you don't follow the letter of the law, there's all kinds of shenanigans that happen Now.

00:17:14.551 --> 00:17:35.183
Furthermore, just this past Monday we read in the same paper, the Wall Street Journal, the editorial section let's grab this quote on what's happening in the Pennsylvania Senate seat as we write this midday, sunday, the state still has some 87,000 provisional ballots to count.

00:17:35.183 --> 00:17:47.318
Provisional means the ballots are in question for one legal reason or another, such as not following proper mail-in ballot procedures or perhaps a question about voter registration.

00:17:47.318 --> 00:17:53.684
Mr Casey, the Democrat, is claiming this means he could still overcome Mr McCormick, the Republican's lead.

00:17:53.684 --> 00:17:55.711
That's highly unlikely.

00:17:55.711 --> 00:18:02.773
About 30,000 provisional ballots are outstanding from Philadelphia and Allegheny County, both Casey strongholds.

00:18:02.773 --> 00:18:06.320
The others come from the rest of the state where McCormick did better.

00:18:06.320 --> 00:18:16.906
Mr Casey has won the 7,700 or so provisional ballots counted so far by about 54 to 46 percent.

00:18:16.906 --> 00:18:23.142
If that margin prevails for the rest of the provisional counting, there's no way Mr Casey can win.

00:18:23.142 --> 00:18:32.364
Mr McCormick's margin could nonetheless fall below the 0.5% which would trigger an automatic recount under state law.

00:18:32.364 --> 00:18:36.019
His margin as of Sunday midday was slightly above that.

00:18:36.019 --> 00:18:54.355
That would give wait for it, mr Elias, a chance to try his legal shenanigans, which are likely to run the gamut from challenging votes for Mr McCormick to searching for heretofore wait for it undiscovered ballots for Mr Casey.

00:18:55.657 --> 00:19:07.622
Mr Elias helped to steal a Senate seat in Minnesota for Al Franken in 2008 by finding a judge to count previously rejected ballots and overturn the lead of Republican Norm Coleman, which we just talked about.

00:19:07.622 --> 00:19:16.218
Back to this Wall Street Journal editorial on Sunday, the Elias method is to look for friendly judges who will roll in his favor.

00:19:16.218 --> 00:19:26.663
Pennsylvania has a Republican secretary of state who supervises elections, but an equally partisan elected Democratic majority on the state Supreme Court.

00:19:26.663 --> 00:19:32.563
So far, governor Josh Shapiro and others aren't commenting on Mr Elias.

00:19:32.563 --> 00:19:36.474
Mr Casey could spare the cost of a recount.

00:19:36.474 --> 00:19:41.642
He has no fair chance of winning by conceding defeat.

00:19:41.642 --> 00:20:03.660
Fair chance of winning by conceding defeat that's what Mr McCormick did after it became clear on a recount was triggered that he couldn't win his 2022 GOP primary race against Mehmet Oz, and Mr McCormick trailed in that race by only 700 or 972 votes 40 times fewer than Mr Casey trails right now.

00:20:05.730 --> 00:20:16.102
Watch this week to see if Mr Chuck Schumer, the Senate Majority Leader, bars Mr McCormick from attending the bipartisan orientation sessions for new senators.

00:20:16.102 --> 00:20:20.862
That would show he's on board for Mr Elias's election steal attempt.

00:20:20.862 --> 00:20:27.416
If he bars Mr McCormick, we assume Republicans will call him out for his election denialism.

00:20:27.416 --> 00:20:36.035
We also await the outraged editorials denouncing this threat as a threat to democracy.

00:20:36.035 --> 00:20:46.787
And so the steal is on for the Pennsylvania Senate seat, and Mark Elias is in the middle of it playing his dirty pool.

00:20:48.190 --> 00:20:59.901
So as we wrap this out, after the recount where Franken was declared the winner by some 225 votes on January 5th 2009, coleman filed a contest in court.

00:20:59.901 --> 00:21:10.342
He said Elias, and Elias continued to represent Franken during this phase, which included participating in a seven-week trial in Ramsey County District Court.

00:21:10.342 --> 00:21:14.480
Elias argued Franken's case through multiple appeals.

00:21:14.480 --> 00:21:21.434
He dealt with the various legal challenges, including the counting of wrongly rejected absentee ballots.

00:21:21.434 --> 00:21:27.795
Now here's the real problem Elias represented or.

00:21:27.795 --> 00:21:37.990
The entire process lasted some eight months, from election day until July 2009, when Franken was finally sworn in as senator, unjustly.

00:21:37.990 --> 00:21:54.126
Elias' successful representation of Franken in this high-profile, extremely close election further cemented his reputation as the top election lawyer and dirty pool export for the radical Democratic Party.

00:21:55.352 --> 00:22:10.601
On a total side note from this potential election steal for the Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2024, there's now more and more reports that there was some shenanigans in the Wisconsin Senate seat very early on the morning of November 6th.

00:22:10.601 --> 00:22:26.924
We're getting the accusation that Republican candidate Eric Hovde says there's a whole large batch of votes reported for Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin that was dropped around 4 am on election night.

00:22:26.924 --> 00:22:33.462
Those votes came from Milwaukee, a Democratic stronghold.

00:22:33.462 --> 00:22:58.340
Now absentee ballot counting appears that Wisconsin election laws allow absentee ballots to be processed on the same election day, but often these absentee election ballots are not duly processed in time and they're not vetted as being true votes.

00:22:58.340 --> 00:23:04.441
So again, dirty, dirty, dirty poll by Democrats.

00:23:05.070 --> 00:23:11.824
If every state would count their votes like Florida, who's the third most populous state in the country, we wouldn't have anything like this.

00:23:11.824 --> 00:23:15.219
Who's releasing vote counts at 4 am anyhow?

00:23:15.219 --> 00:23:18.579
Who's watching these people that are counting the votes?

00:23:18.579 --> 00:23:25.378
Folks, let's make America like Florida for vote counting, so we can have election integrity.

00:23:25.378 --> 00:23:42.717
So in today's Mojo Minute as the election returns, become final watch for the Pennsylvania and Wisconsin Senate seats to get lawyered up, because Mark Elias is the number two threat to real democracy, much like George Soros is.

00:23:42.717 --> 00:23:52.219
Our country would do much better when elections end, with the voters casting the ballots and not the lawyers counting them.

00:23:52.219 --> 00:24:02.942
Let's make America like Florida for cleaning up our federal elections so we can avoid the radical Democrats playing dirty pool.

00:24:05.851 --> 00:24:07.094
Thank you for joining us.

00:24:07.094 --> 00:24:10.500
We hope you enjoyed this Theory to Action podcast.

00:24:10.500 --> 00:24:19.674
Be sure to check out our show page at teammojoacademycom, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast, as well as other great resources.

00:24:19.674 --> 00:24:23.502
Until next time, keep getting your mojo on.

SPECIAL -- MM#367 -- Radical Democrats Playing Dirty Pool

Listen On

Recent Episodes