MM#361--Taxes Have Consequences

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:07.612 --> 00:00:20.807
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:20.807 --> 00:00:24.850
Now here's your host, david Kaiser.

00:00:25.859 --> 00:00:35.284
Hello, I am David and welcome back to another Mojo Minute Now, since we are just three weeks away from the 2024 presidential election.

00:00:35.284 --> 00:00:40.054
We have some folks telling some whopper of lies out there.

00:00:40.054 --> 00:00:45.051
We are going to wade back into our politics this week.

00:00:45.051 --> 00:00:56.652
I want to talk about the US economy and why it matters, and why the candidates' actual plans for the economy are, and why that is a big deal.

00:00:56.652 --> 00:01:00.488
Because isn't the US economy just like any other economy?

00:01:00.488 --> 00:01:07.299
Well, in fact, that's not true economy.

00:01:07.299 --> 00:01:08.561
Well, in fact, that's not true.

00:01:08.561 --> 00:01:18.661
Our presidential candidates should be held to a very high level of giving details about their plans, because our economy is the greatest economy in the history of the world.

00:01:18.661 --> 00:01:26.754
This is one area where journalists and commentators should be peppering these candidates on their specific plans.

00:01:28.042 --> 00:01:30.629
The United States has the world's largest economy.

00:01:30.629 --> 00:01:35.611
It accounts for approximately one-fifth of global GDP.

00:01:35.611 --> 00:01:45.094
That sheer size means that any changes in the US economy have a substantial ripple effect across the world.

00:01:45.094 --> 00:02:00.332
The US also accounts for a quarter of global GDP at market exchange rates, one-fifth of the global foreign direct investment and even more than a third of stock market capitalization.

00:02:00.332 --> 00:02:05.792
So all that means it's a very big deal.

00:02:05.792 --> 00:02:16.435
Furthermore, the United States is the largest export destination for one-fifth of the countries worldwide.

00:02:16.435 --> 00:02:24.424
Us multinationals have a significant presence abroad and foreign companies have substantial operations in the US.

00:02:24.424 --> 00:02:41.634
The US has free trade agreements with numerous countries, including a country to our north Canada to our south Mexico that's through the USMCA as well as free trade agreements, australia, south Korea and Israel, among others.

00:02:41.634 --> 00:02:46.497
And we cannot forget the actual bond and equity markets.

00:02:46.497 --> 00:02:53.758
Those are the largest and most liquid in the world.

00:02:53.758 --> 00:02:59.116
The New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ are the world's largest two stock exchanges by market capitalization and even by trade volume.

00:02:59.116 --> 00:03:08.713
And, most importantly, the US dollar is the most widely used currency in global trade and in financial transactions.

00:03:08.713 --> 00:03:13.069
For that matter, it's the world's reserve currency.

00:03:13.069 --> 00:03:16.528
That's super important.

00:03:16.528 --> 00:03:30.848
The US dollar, the greenback, is the reserve currency for the world, is the reserve currency for the world, so that all of that means this is a huge, huge responsibility.

00:03:30.848 --> 00:03:38.002
That's why the whole world is watching the United States and its presidential election.

00:03:38.002 --> 00:03:45.067
If we screw things up, if we get things wrong, the rest of the world knows they will suffer with us.

00:03:45.067 --> 00:03:48.294
And so I just found out.

00:03:48.294 --> 00:04:10.326
I just found it extremely rich, very rich over the weekend, as I saw former President Barack Obama lecturing us and his brothers about how Donald Trump had a growing and prosperous economy because of Barack Obama.

00:04:10.326 --> 00:04:13.598
What Police?

00:04:13.598 --> 00:04:25.302
Yes, barack Obama is trying to make the argument his economy was so good that it carried over into Donald Trump's years in office.

00:04:25.302 --> 00:04:41.860
I mean, I have heard the former president tell some blatant lies, but boy, oh boy, holy smokes, holy smokes, jeez.

00:04:41.860 --> 00:04:50.124
Barack Obama's economy was in complete stagnation for eight long years.

00:04:50.124 --> 00:04:52.574
Most of us suffered through it.

00:04:52.574 --> 00:04:54.180
We remember it.

00:04:56.050 --> 00:05:02.697
Now, to make this all very easy to understand, the US president, along with Congress, sets US tax policy.

00:05:02.697 --> 00:05:08.892
The Congress usually defers to the presidency to bring to the table his plan for the US economy.

00:05:08.892 --> 00:05:13.291
So, by law, those spending bills will start with US House of Representatives.

00:05:13.291 --> 00:05:29.357
Now, to make all this very, very simple because it's a little bit more complicated than this we're just going to talk about one pillar of the three pillars, the three main pillars or drivers of US economic policy.

00:05:29.357 --> 00:05:35.204
Those three pillars are tax policy, regulation policy and trade policy.

00:05:35.204 --> 00:05:42.694
And if we're going to put a percentage on each of these categories, how much do they actually influence the US economy?

00:05:42.694 --> 00:06:04.021
Tax policy will account for 50%, so it's half of the accelerator or the breaking in the US economy, spending and regulation, 25%, another quarter of the economy and trade policy, another 25%, the remaining 25% and again, just to keep things simple.

00:06:04.021 --> 00:06:12.863
So, if you're looking at the equation, the most common question most people want to know is how do we get the economy going?

00:06:12.863 --> 00:06:34.586
Well, we have the data to show us exactly how to put our foot on the accelerator, and that data is wonderfully laid out in a very consequential book that almost no one will ever read because both parties are economically illiterate on all such matters.

00:06:34.586 --> 00:06:45.718
That book is Taxes have Consequences, by Art Laffer, the great supply-side economist and the author of the infamous Laffer Curve.

00:06:45.718 --> 00:06:53.081
So let's in fact talk about Barack Obama's economy versus Donald Trump's economy.

00:06:53.081 --> 00:06:54.264
Let's go to the book.

00:06:57.471 --> 00:07:05.564
When Donald J Trump became president in 2017, american tax rates stood at high levels on two major counts.

00:07:05.564 --> 00:07:14.630
Rates were high in comparison both to recent American history and to two and two major countries worldwide.

00:07:14.630 --> 00:07:19.238
The top individual income tax rate was 39.6%.

00:07:19.238 --> 00:07:26.074
This was the rate the Bill Clinton's tax increase law had put in place in 1993.

00:07:26.074 --> 00:07:37.766
From 2001 through 2012, through the George W Bush presidency, as well as the first Barack Obama term, the top individual rate was lower than this.

00:07:37.766 --> 00:07:47.937
It went down from 39.6% in the beginning of 2001 and held at 35% from 2003 through 2012.

00:07:47.937 --> 00:08:09.295
The top corporate income tax rate 35% from 1993 through 2017, was the highest in the developed world at the time Trump took office Among the 36 nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, oecd.

00:08:09.295 --> 00:08:29.119
As of 2017, the average top combined corporate rate in the United States, adding up to the maximum rate of 35% in the average state and local rates, was the highest, at a fraction of over 38%.

00:08:29.119 --> 00:08:32.544
France was the second, at 34%.

00:08:32.544 --> 00:08:35.659
Important trading partners were at 25% or lower.

00:08:35.659 --> 00:08:38.979
These included the United Kingdom, israel and Spain.

00:08:38.979 --> 00:08:54.984
The top combined corporate tax rate in Ireland, which, with its low rate, had become a global investment magnet, was the lowest in the OECD at all, of 12.5%.

00:08:55.932 --> 00:09:05.941
As tax rates stayed at elevated levels in the United States through 2016 and into 2017, economic growth was distinctly mediocre.

00:09:05.941 --> 00:09:09.091
This was so in both comparative senses.

00:09:09.091 --> 00:09:10.792
This was so in both comparative senses.

00:09:10.792 --> 00:09:18.014
Growth was slow with respect to recent American history and concurrently with major nations abroad.

00:09:18.014 --> 00:09:29.461
As of 2017, the United States had failed to achieve a 3% economic growth for each of the previous dozen years.

00:09:29.461 --> 00:09:41.648
Let me repeat that again as of 2017, the United States had failed to achieve a year of 3% economic growth for each of the previous dozen years.

00:09:41.648 --> 00:09:45.000
That's horrific.

00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:45.563
That's horrific.

00:09:45.563 --> 00:09:49.596
This was the first time this had ever happened in American history.

00:09:49.596 --> 00:09:56.958
Moreover, in 2016 and 17, the Eurozone rate of growth was faster than that of the United States.

00:09:56.958 --> 00:10:17.975
In 2016, while notoriously scleric, europe grew at about 2%, america grew at a bismal 1.75%, and when the Eurozone almost hit 2.5% in 2017, in came the United States at a fraction lower, at 2.25%.

00:10:17.975 --> 00:10:31.432
In the years in which Donald Trump won and then assumed office, american growth was bush league against its own precedent and brought up the rear against the old world.

00:10:34.385 --> 00:10:39.717
So the easiest way to think about all these taxes is think about the fat man and thin man comparison.

00:10:39.717 --> 00:10:47.789
This is the old Bibi Netanyahu economic argument and why he grew the state of Israel so fast.

00:10:47.789 --> 00:10:51.918
That is now a global hub of innovation in high-tech industries.

00:10:51.918 --> 00:11:03.445
Now, as a brief aside, the average annual GDP rate for Israel over the past 25 years from 1999 to 2024?

00:11:03.445 --> 00:11:06.416
Approximately 3.76%.

00:11:06.416 --> 00:11:14.458
This indicates a strong and consistent economic expansion over those 25 years.

00:11:14.458 --> 00:11:21.988
Several years, in fact, there was high growth rates, particularly high growth rates Year 2000,.

00:11:21.988 --> 00:11:31.027
10% growth 2021, 8.6% growth 2022, 6.83% growth 2022, 6.83% growth.

00:11:31.027 --> 00:11:37.999
Israel's economic performance has been impressive when compared to even regional averages throughout the Middle East.

00:11:37.999 --> 00:11:58.529
No-transcript, just incredible growth and BB credits.

00:11:58.529 --> 00:12:09.970
Supply-side economics, which the number one pillar of that policy is tax rate cuts and keeping domestic spending down.

00:12:09.970 --> 00:12:12.523
Now back to our US comparison.

00:12:13.794 --> 00:12:19.883
Let's check out some more important nuggets of economic wisdom from this wonderful book.

00:12:19.883 --> 00:12:32.283
You know, as an aside, this book Taxes have Consequences is just a hundred year romp through actual tax policy.

00:12:32.283 --> 00:12:35.159
The data you get in the weeds.

00:12:35.159 --> 00:12:46.629
Every presidential administration, every economic forecast, every tax cut bill you get into the weeds, and at a very high level.

00:12:46.629 --> 00:12:55.956
It again proves the fact that we know tax cuts and supply-side economics works, because when it was tried in the 20s it worked.

00:12:55.956 --> 00:13:01.456
When it was tried under that was in Coolidge, under Coolidge, and then we fast forward.

00:13:01.456 --> 00:13:04.327
And when it was tried under Kennedy, it worked, and then we fast forward.

00:13:04.327 --> 00:13:06.115
And when it was tried under Kennedy, it worked, and then we fast forward.

00:13:06.115 --> 00:13:08.580
And when it was tried under Reagan it worked.

00:13:08.580 --> 00:13:11.144
Supply side economics works.

00:13:11.144 --> 00:13:15.480
It is not this voodoo economics that everybody talks about.

00:13:15.480 --> 00:13:16.741
We have the data.

00:13:16.741 --> 00:13:21.938
The data proves objectively that we know tax cuts work.

00:13:21.938 --> 00:13:26.729
It drives economic growth and everybody prospers from it.

00:13:26.729 --> 00:13:33.868
So with that little diatribe, let's go back to the book to talk about economic growth.

00:13:35.676 --> 00:13:41.087
Typically, economic growth over the course of a long expansion is at first large and then moderate.

00:13:41.087 --> 00:13:44.424
This is so for statistical reasons.

00:13:44.424 --> 00:13:49.738
After a recession, the denominator of the GDP growth fraction is low.

00:13:49.738 --> 00:13:56.576
Growth over a year is the year's level of GDP divided by that of the previous year.

00:13:56.576 --> 00:14:07.508
If the previous year had a recession, the recovery year in which the economy is returning to normal operation stands to have a distinctly high growth rate.

00:14:07.508 --> 00:14:16.970
The growth year and a year following years of economic recovery, in contrast, stands to be smaller.

00:14:16.970 --> 00:14:22.726
In the 30s, the 60s and the 80s, as well as the early 2000s, such a pattern held.

00:14:22.726 --> 00:14:31.683
Growth was strong as the recovery from recession took hold and then slowed as the expansion reached past three or four years.

00:14:31.683 --> 00:14:37.458
A quintessential example was the Ronald Reagan boom of 80 and 82.

00:14:37.458 --> 00:14:57.154
After the run of 5% to 6%, growth moderated to between 3% and 4% from 86, 87, 88, and 89.

00:14:57.154 --> 00:15:05.710
The recovery from the severe Great Recession of 2008 and 2009 did not fit this pattern.

00:15:05.710 --> 00:15:13.215
Again, the recovery from the severe Great Recession of 2008-2009 did not fit this pattern.

00:15:13.215 --> 00:15:24.980
This is the last year of George W Bush Bush 43, and Barack Obama's first year Back to the book.

00:15:25.075 --> 00:15:29.486
Recovery out of the deep trough was slow and stayed that way.

00:15:29.486 --> 00:15:37.649
From 2010 through 2017, the most growth ever got to was 2.7% per year.

00:15:37.649 --> 00:15:45.306
The average rate was 2%, distinctly lower than the regular growth rate of 3% for the whole 20th century.

00:15:45.306 --> 00:15:50.339
2018 and 2019, however, the growth rate bumped up.

00:15:50.339 --> 00:15:55.989
The 2018 rate was 2.9%, the highest since the Great Recession.

00:15:55.989 --> 00:16:01.947
This is to compare the average size of the economy in 2018 with that of 2017.

00:16:01.947 --> 00:16:15.006
Comparing the size of the economy at the end of December 18 to that of December 17, growth was 3%, the first time that number had been touched since 2005.

00:16:15.006 --> 00:16:24.325
In 2019, growth came in at 2.3% higher than the average of Obama's years 2010 to 2017.

00:16:24.325 --> 00:16:29.030
It was a unique sequence in American economic accounts.

00:16:29.995 --> 00:16:41.446
Eight years into an economic expansion a mediocre one for sure, that of 2010 to 2017, the Obama years economic growth then kicked up.

00:16:41.446 --> 00:16:46.787
This was so even though global economic growth was slowing down.

00:16:46.787 --> 00:16:56.625
Eurozone economic growth fell sharply after December of 2017, going from 2.5% to 1% and staying there.

00:16:56.625 --> 00:17:05.263
Under Obama, economic growth was sluggish in the United States and exceeding by that in Europe.

00:17:05.263 --> 00:17:18.154
In the United States and exceeding by that in Europe After the Trump tax cut, growth was higher than Obama and beat that of Europe.

00:17:21.555 --> 00:17:26.771
So if the former president, barack Obama, to say that he has anything to do with the economic success of Donald Trump during his presidency, just a plain, flat-out lie.

00:17:26.771 --> 00:17:30.881
Just plain and simple, flat-out lie.

00:17:30.881 --> 00:17:36.516
Folks, what does that fact-checking website put out when it's a whopper of a lie?

00:17:36.516 --> 00:17:42.084
Oh, yes, yes, pants on fire lie.

00:17:42.084 --> 00:17:43.945
Pants on fire false claim.

00:17:43.945 --> 00:17:47.411
Yes, this is a pants on fire false claim.

00:17:47.411 --> 00:17:49.903
In fact, it's more than that it's a double.

00:17:49.903 --> 00:17:54.326
It's a double or triple pants on fire false claim.

00:17:55.375 --> 00:18:01.208
Taxes do indeed have consequences, and we know how to get the economy going in the right direction.

00:18:01.536 --> 00:18:03.182
This book outlines it.

00:18:03.182 --> 00:18:19.844
You can read all 100 years of tax policy, from the 1920s to the 2020s, and we know how to beat inflation too, and how you do that is by growing the economy, and the number one way to grow the economy is with tax rates.

00:18:19.844 --> 00:18:28.406
Taxes have consequences, and good tax policy accounts for 50% of our economic makeup.

00:18:28.406 --> 00:18:38.134
So in today's Mojo Minute, while you have candidates out there calling for this or that, one side wants to get the economy moving again.

00:18:38.134 --> 00:18:46.577
One side wants to kick the pants to this economy, and the way you do.

00:18:46.577 --> 00:18:56.929
That is to stimulate the supply side of the equation, and that is done with reducing and cutting marginal tax rates, plain and simple.

00:18:56.929 --> 00:19:03.208
That, indeed, will get the economy moving again, because taxes do have consequences.

00:19:03.208 --> 00:19:13.465
In fact, they have major, major consequences, and we need to get back to 3% to 4% growth again in this country, and that can't happen fast enough.

00:19:13.465 --> 00:19:24.454
So keep fighting the good fight out there and let's pray that the candidate who cuts taxes wins.

00:19:38.442 --> 00:19:39.603
Thank you for joining us.

00:19:39.603 --> 00:19:41.483
The candidate who cuts taxes wins.

00:19:41.483 --> 00:19:45.287
Until next time, keep getting your mojo on.

MM#361--Taxes Have Consequences

Listen On

Recent Episodes