MM#347---The Conservative Revolution Lives on in 1994

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:07.612 --> 00:00:20.807
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:20.807 --> 00:00:24.849
Now here's your host, david Kaiser.

00:00:33.479 --> 00:00:35.786
Hello, I am David and welcome back to another Mojo Minute.

00:00:35.786 --> 00:00:42.981
Over the past four weeks we have covered in the Pivotal Tuesdays series the pivotal election of 1912 and how radical Woodrow Wilson was.

00:00:42.981 --> 00:01:13.948
We followed that by talking about Woodrow Wilson's wife, who essentially ran the government without being duly elected for some 18 unbelievable months, which most likely is what happened in this crazy election year of 2024, when we had Jill Biden essentially ushering around a senile, non-copus mentis President Joe Biden for some three of the last years.

00:01:13.948 --> 00:01:20.906
So I can't imagine what the real story is once that history is properly researched and written.

00:01:20.906 --> 00:01:52.049
But then we pivoted to the pivotal election of 1932, where FDR grew the federal government to an astronomical size with the hopes of ending the Great Depression, which he ultimately didn't accomplish and which we covered just after that in our episode of the New Deal or Raw Deal, and we concluded it was a very raw deal how FDR's economic policies ultimately hurt the American people.

00:01:52.049 --> 00:02:04.745
Then we zoomed up to the pivotal election of 1968, where we covered an insecure Richard Nixon barely winning and then leading the GOP off a cliff with his liberal policies.

00:02:04.745 --> 00:02:21.574
And we follow that by just how crazy the year 1968 itself was, with two assassinations and the drugs and the peace protest and the race riots and the more riots and everything was a riot.

00:02:21.574 --> 00:02:22.379
Everybody was angry about something.

00:02:22.379 --> 00:02:37.093
And we follow that two-part episode with the crazy Democratic National Convention of 1968, where all hell broke loose in Chicago and where the whole world was watching while all hell broke loose.

00:02:37.093 --> 00:02:57.389
And then this past week we covered the restoration of the constitutional order in our country with the pivotal election of 1980 and the legacy of the conservative counter-revolution of Ronald Reagan and how they made America great again the first time they were the OG.

00:02:57.389 --> 00:03:08.683
That was a two-part episode as well, so be sure to check out our political sprint over the last four weeks and the accompanying episodes from those time periods.

00:03:09.384 --> 00:03:16.425
We think it is some of our best work and before we kick off today's episode, be sure to give us some feedback.

00:03:16.425 --> 00:03:29.125
You can do that easily in the show notes with a new feature that's been out there for probably three or four months but, as your duly noted host, I have forgotten to tell you about it.

00:03:29.125 --> 00:03:33.882
So shame on me, but we have a new feature there in the show notes.

00:03:33.882 --> 00:03:36.331
You can click on the link to send us a text message.

00:03:36.331 --> 00:03:41.067
It is free, it's immediate and it comes right to our inbox.

00:03:41.067 --> 00:03:42.811
We love to get the feedback from you.

00:03:42.811 --> 00:03:45.246
The listeners tell us how we're doing.

00:03:45.246 --> 00:03:55.127
So again, please click on the link in the show notes to send us a text message it's the first link you see there in the show notes to provide us feedback.

00:03:55.989 --> 00:04:06.013
You could possibly tell us books we should cover, or how you liked that previous episode, or how that episode actually sucked and how you hated it.

00:04:06.013 --> 00:04:08.962
Well, actually, don't send us that at all.

00:04:08.962 --> 00:04:11.368
Please just keep that to yourself.

00:04:11.368 --> 00:04:18.271
As your mom said, if you can't say anything, nice, do not say anything at all, but do send us the good comments.

00:04:18.271 --> 00:04:22.908
We love to get the good comments, so please keep those coming.

00:04:22.908 --> 00:04:26.961
Click on that text link and send us a text message.

00:04:26.961 --> 00:04:34.547
We'd love to hear the feedback from you, especially of those good comments, so we can navel, gaze over here a little bit.

00:04:35.810 --> 00:04:50.307
And with that we are going to move to our feature programming, as they say in showbiz, and in our last episode we talked about the Reagan Revolution and what happened after George HW Bush lost in 1992.

00:04:50.307 --> 00:04:55.942
Was the Reagan Revolution over and done with after that election?

00:04:55.942 --> 00:05:01.732
And we said not, so fast, my friend.

00:05:01.732 --> 00:05:23.932
Today's episode we will cover how the conservative revolution, which started in 1980 with that pivotal election, it continued on in 1984 with Reagan winning 49 states and then continued on in 1990 or 1988 with the vaunted third term and the election of Bush 41.

00:05:23.932 --> 00:05:47.511
And then it finally continued all the way past Bush's defeat in 1992, where he was branded as an imposter to the Reagan revolution and where in 1994, a fiery brand of conservatives would upend Washington DC with their contract with America.

00:05:47.511 --> 00:05:56.726
And for that we're going to go to the 1996 almanac of American politics, the Bible of political junkies like myself.

00:05:56.726 --> 00:06:06.095
And in the 1996 almanac he writes about the 1994 election, saying this Go into the book.

00:06:06.095 --> 00:06:22.548
But the 1994 election does go a long way towards settling an argument that had been raging for at least a dozen years about where we stand in our history.

00:06:23.750 --> 00:06:36.593
The more familiar theory of our times is implicit in the narratives of the Great New Deal historians and set forth as a cyclical theory by the best of them, arthur Schlesinger Jr.

00:06:36.593 --> 00:06:46.170
According to this theory, american politics turns primarily on economic issues and is a continuous struggle between the haves and the have-nots.

00:06:46.170 --> 00:07:03.791
Every generation, a new leader comes forward, supported by a generation of young idealists proposing public action to solve national problems, that leader and his programs are embraced for a time by the people, who then sink back to support conservatives who try to maintain the status quo.

00:07:03.791 --> 00:07:21.384
In this view, history always moves to the left, lurching leftward when prodded by liberal leaders, then pausing, then lurching leftward again Jefferson, jackson, lincoln, the two Roosevelts, kennedy and, said, schlesinger.

00:07:21.384 --> 00:07:25.432
Hopefully, after the 1992 election, bill Clinton.

00:07:27.201 --> 00:07:37.692
But another theory holds that politics divides Americans less often on economic than along cultural lines, according to race, religion, region, ethnic group and cultural values.

00:07:37.692 --> 00:07:43.552
It believes that Americans are looking to government not so much for economic redistribution.

00:07:43.552 --> 00:07:52.843
Looking to government not so much for economic redistribution Indeed, until the mid-20th century, government did not seem capable of massive economic redistribution but for the maintenance of basic order.

00:07:52.843 --> 00:08:06.074
Not some authoritarian order, it must be added, but an orderly framework in which people can make their livings, raise their families and work together in their communities.

00:08:06.074 --> 00:08:26.254
This theory holds that most Americans do not cast their votes just as a referendum on the performance of the macroeconomy, though some marginal number of votes, frequently enough to change the outcome of otherwise close elections, often do so.

00:08:26.254 --> 00:08:36.250
Rather, their voting allegiance is determined by the accumulated effects of experiences over the time that cut to the quick of their lives.

00:08:36.250 --> 00:08:57.094
Thus, millions of Americans switched from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party in response to the economic disorder of the 1930s, and then millions of Americans switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party in response to the cultural disorder of the late 1960s.

00:08:57.094 --> 00:09:19.365
There is no inevitable cycle here occurring at a certain place on the calendar, rather than people responding to real events and carry the experience of those events with them the rest of their lives or until until some other extended series of events cuts as deeply.

00:09:19.365 --> 00:09:23.451
And doesn't that sound?

00:09:23.451 --> 00:09:23.931
Doesn't that sound?

00:09:23.931 --> 00:09:27.995
Doesn't that second theory sound more closer to the truth?

00:09:27.995 --> 00:09:36.714
The New Deal historians always seem to want to go back to more authoritarian, centralized government theories.

00:09:36.714 --> 00:09:49.604
This play out over the last 30 plus years.

00:09:49.604 --> 00:10:04.570
Since I've been a political junkie since my days of coming out of college and going right to Washington DC and watching it up close for three years and then coming back to the heartland and watching it from afar, I'd have to say unequivocally the second theory is what has the most credence.

00:10:04.890 --> 00:10:05.852
Let's go back to the book.

00:10:05.852 --> 00:10:14.013
The presidential results of the last quarter century give powerful support to the second theory.

00:10:14.013 --> 00:10:25.855
Republicans won five of six presidential elections from 1968 to 1988 and lost the other 1976, by only a 50 to 48 percent margin.

00:10:25.855 --> 00:10:38.101
Republicans had an average margin of 53 to 43 percent, a larger advantage than any party has won over any other six elections in american history.

00:10:38.101 --> 00:10:50.167
But democrats won control the senate during most of that period and held the and in 1992.

00:10:50.167 --> 00:10:58.354
When Bill Clinton was elected, schlesinger was the only one of the many who argued that his victory proved the cyclical theory was right.

00:10:58.354 --> 00:11:10.251
The new liberal leader had arrived Surrounded by a coatiere of idealistic aides and America was ready, in this generation once again for a lurch to the left.

00:11:10.251 --> 00:11:15.750
And here comes our conservative nugget of wisdom.

00:11:16.380 --> 00:11:27.294
Going back to the book, the 1994 election goes about as far as any election could towards settling the argument.

00:11:27.294 --> 00:11:40.336
Franklin Roosevelt, after his first victory in 1932, saw his party gain seats in the House and the Senate in 1934, the only such off-year gain for the party in power in American history.

00:11:40.336 --> 00:11:54.596
John Kennedy, after his victory in 1960, saw his party gain four seats in the Senate and lose four in the House in 1962, a trade-off any president would accept and the second best showing of any party in history.

00:11:54.596 --> 00:12:05.159
In contrast, bill Clinton, after his victory in 1992, saw his party lose control of both the Senate and the House in 1994.

00:12:05.159 --> 00:12:14.654
The most disastrous first-term loss for a president since Herbert Hoover in the Great Depression in 1930.

00:12:14.654 --> 00:12:26.830
Since World War II, the average loss of the party in power during the first term after the election of a president has been zero seats in the Senate and 13 in the House.

00:12:26.830 --> 00:12:32.980
Bill Clinton's party lost eight seats in the Senate and 52 in the House.

00:12:32.980 --> 00:12:40.594
Moreover, these losses came at a time when the macroeconomy was growing and the United States was at peace.

00:12:41.559 --> 00:12:46.513
A clearer repudiation of the party in power cannot be imagined.

00:12:46.513 --> 00:12:51.792
Wherever history is headed, it is no longer headed left.

00:12:51.792 --> 00:12:55.409
The results were no accident.

00:12:55.409 --> 00:13:03.057
So just how did this fiery brand of conservatives win in 1994?

00:13:03.057 --> 00:13:14.197
Well, enter the vaunted contract with America Going back to Michael Barone, with America going back to Michael Barone.

00:13:14.197 --> 00:13:37.837
So the forces nationalizing the election were already very busy at work when Newt Gingrich assembled 300 plus Republican incumbents and candidates on the steps of the Capitol September 27th to sign the House Republican contract with America.

00:13:37.837 --> 00:14:06.113
When White House political strategist two weeks later decided to run against the contract, even before the contract was signed, most Republican challengers and open seat candidates were running on platforms very much like it, emphasizing not the personal qualification and local issues Democrats have been campaigning on for years, but their support for specific measures to discipline and cut the size of government, the balanced budget amendment, the line item, veto term limits, applying to Congress the laws that it applies to everyone else.

00:14:06.113 --> 00:14:19.216
The contract simply helped to standardize Republican campaigns even more and to give the party a convenient label for a set of proposals that were widely popular.

00:14:20.341 --> 00:14:28.195
The Democrats' decision to run against the contract is explicable only by observing they had nothing else to run on.

00:14:28.195 --> 00:14:32.171
Their institutional advantages, as already noted, were vanishing.

00:14:32.171 --> 00:14:35.203
To run on, their institutional advantages, as already noted, were vanishing.

00:14:35.203 --> 00:14:39.153
The economic package, crime bill and health care plan they had counted on as assets turned out to be liabilities.

00:14:39.153 --> 00:14:57.182
The president, whose support they expected might help them as Franklin Roosevelt helped in 1934 and John Kennedy in 1962, ended up traveling to the Middle East in October because he had so few invitations to the Middle West.

00:14:57.182 --> 00:15:06.522
Ha ha, bill Clinton traveled to the Middle East instead of helping his own party in the Midwest.

00:15:06.522 --> 00:15:14.315
Not good when you are not a very popular president, aka Joe Biden and now Kamala Harris.

00:15:14.315 --> 00:15:21.839
But let's face it wherever Bill Clinton was headed in 1994, it didn't pan out because there was no Middle East peace plan.

00:15:21.839 --> 00:15:38.091
So you can tell how deep and how fundamental was the Republican revolution that continued on by the federal elections in 1994, but the state and the gubernatorial elections were just as deep.

00:15:39.541 --> 00:15:52.486
Again, going back to Michael Barone on this very point, more evidence that the congressional results were no accident came in the elections for governor and other state offices.

00:15:52.486 --> 00:16:00.091
The eight largest states with 49% of the nation's population all had seriously contested elections for governor.

00:16:00.091 --> 00:16:13.773
Republicans won seven of the eight races and the Democrat who won the other, lawton Childs of Florida, carried only voters age 65 and over and lost among voters under 65.

00:16:13.773 --> 00:16:20.192
Republicans won control of both houses in the legislature in Pennsylvania, ohio, michigan and Illinois.

00:16:20.192 --> 00:16:26.700
They won lower state offices in New York, ohio, michigan, illinois, florida, texas and California.

00:16:26.700 --> 00:16:42.455
In all these contests there were personal and local factors and different personalities, but in all the basic contrast between the parties closely resembled the contrast between the parties nationally.

00:16:42.455 --> 00:16:52.734
And here's another nugget the Republican victory in 1994 arose from fundamental, not incidental causes.

00:16:52.734 --> 00:17:06.993
It was the result of voters' rational responses to the party's differences on major issues, not to some accidental events or irrational pyrrhosis of anger.

00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:21.936
The long course of election results over the last quarter century proves as much as these things can ever be proved, that 1992 was the exception and 1994 is the rule.

00:17:21.936 --> 00:17:37.656
We are moving away from and our renunciation of traditional cultural mores and possibly ready to embrace them again.

00:17:37.656 --> 00:17:54.297
We cherish and inchoate mostly unarticulated American nationalism that guides our unfocused, seeming contradictory impulses on foreign and defense and trade policy.

00:17:54.297 --> 00:18:24.047
So you can see, as we take a big step back and we look at how things progressed over the course of the mid to late 90s, with the election in 1994 and then moving on to 1996, you can see the conservative counter-revolution that started in 1980 had simply ground that march towards progressivism by the liberals to an abrupt halt.

00:18:24.047 --> 00:18:31.904
The middle to late 90s and even all the way to probably the election of 2008, the country remained a stalemate.

00:18:31.904 --> 00:18:35.343
Probably the election of 2008,.

00:18:35.343 --> 00:18:36.445
The country remained a stalemate.

00:18:36.445 --> 00:18:36.605
In fact.

00:18:36.605 --> 00:18:39.875
Here's a broad brush of just how the country looked politically over that time.

00:18:39.875 --> 00:18:43.544
Actually, let's go from 1994 all the way to our current time.

00:18:43.564 --> 00:18:49.605
Since 1994, the Republican Party, the GOP, has controlled the US Congress multiple times.

00:18:49.605 --> 00:18:54.402
Let's break down their control of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

00:18:54.402 --> 00:18:56.424
First, the House of Representatives.

00:18:56.424 --> 00:19:01.555
So it had control from 1995 all the way to 2007.

00:19:01.555 --> 00:19:07.452
They gained control in the 94 elections and they maintained it until the 2006 elections.

00:19:07.452 --> 00:19:10.782
Democrats took over in 2007.

00:19:10.782 --> 00:19:21.115
Republicans regained control in the 2010 elections after the Tea Party and the two years the radical two years of Barack Obama.

00:19:21.115 --> 00:19:34.296
They held it again in the House until 2018, when Democrats won the majority and Republicans just gained control of the House again in the 2020 elections 2022 elections.

00:19:34.296 --> 00:19:37.307
Rather, now about the Senate.

00:19:37.307 --> 00:19:45.054
Republicans took control following the 94 elections and maintained it until Democrats gained the majority in 2001.

00:19:45.054 --> 00:19:51.653
Republicans regained it after the 2002 elections and held it until the 2006 election.

00:19:51.653 --> 00:19:58.689
It after the 2002 elections and held it until the 2006 election.

00:19:58.689 --> 00:20:02.958
Republicans controlled the Senate after the 2014 elections, all the way until the Democrats took it in 2021.

00:20:02.958 --> 00:20:11.402
So, overall, the Federal Congress since 1994 has controlled the House for approximately 18 years and the Senate for about 16 years.

00:20:12.624 --> 00:20:16.833
And what were the major accomplishments of that Reagan revolution in the 90s?

00:20:16.833 --> 00:20:19.086
Well, they were significant.

00:20:19.086 --> 00:20:21.207
Number one welfare reform.

00:20:21.207 --> 00:20:32.991
That was part of there was 10 items on the contract with America and the three big ones were welfare reform, the balanced budget and tax cuts.

00:20:32.991 --> 00:20:39.029
You'll remember the balanced budget is what Ronald Reagan ran on as a constitutional amendment.

00:20:39.029 --> 00:20:58.333
Now, getting back to welfare, it's one of the welfare reform was one of the most notable achievements because it overhauled the complete welfare system, culminated in personal responsibility in the Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.

00:20:58.333 --> 00:21:11.070
This is where the fiery conservatives essentially cornered Bill Clinton and negotiated him to death until he signed it.

00:21:11.070 --> 00:21:15.405
I think I was there as an intern in 96.

00:21:15.405 --> 00:21:22.523
I think we forced him three times to the table and on the third time he actually did sign it.

00:21:22.523 --> 00:21:29.816
It was a boon to the economy because it got a whole bunch of people working again.

00:21:29.816 --> 00:21:34.065
Second item of the Contractor with America was the balanced budget.

00:21:34.065 --> 00:21:40.106
In collaboration with President Bill Clinton, again, they achieved balanced federal budgets in the late 90s.

00:21:40.106 --> 00:21:49.250
It was the first time the budget was balanced since 1969, and the country ran a surplus by 2000.

00:21:49.250 --> 00:21:55.647
Unheard of with our $34 trillion deficit right now.

00:21:56.935 --> 00:22:05.210
And then the GOP pushed through significant tax cuts which were part of the broader economic agenda to stimulate growth along with welfare reform.

00:22:05.210 --> 00:22:09.261
The broader economic agenda to stimulate growth along with welfare reform.

00:22:09.261 --> 00:22:24.961
These tax cuts align with conservative economic principles, mainly supply-side economics, that Ronald Reagan introduced to the party and the country and that just contributed to give a kick in the pants to the economy and we had a whole other series of robust economic growth.

00:22:24.961 --> 00:22:38.609
In fact, that growth was so extraordinary that we had GDP growth rates of 4% or higher from 1997 through 2000.

00:22:38.609 --> 00:22:41.336
Unemployment rates dropped significantly.

00:22:41.336 --> 00:22:47.368
The economy created another 3 million jobs each year from 97 to 99.

00:22:47.368 --> 00:22:54.223
And that's poultry compared to or.

00:22:54.223 --> 00:22:56.888
What we're doing now is poultry compared to what was done then.

00:22:56.888 --> 00:22:59.863
We had crime and tax relief.

00:22:59.863 --> 00:23:14.259
The GOP Congress enacted measures to reduce crime and provide middle class tax relief, like we talked about, um efforts to reduce the size of government and come implement a more conservative approach to governance.

00:23:14.259 --> 00:23:23.388
Um, so you can see, the GOP Congress in the mid to late 1990s got a good deal done.

00:23:24.941 --> 00:23:47.807
Coming on the coattails of the conservative revolution begun in 1980 under president reagan and essentially reset the political landscape, gop had not had control of either the house or the senate for a long period of time, going all the way back to even before the world war ii, all the way back to the 20s.

00:23:47.807 --> 00:23:59.106
So we just heard about federal elections and that conservative revolution was in fact much deeper than that.

00:23:59.106 --> 00:24:09.925
Taking a look at the state level, like we talked about since 1994, the Democratic Party's control over state legislatures and governorships had been significant.

00:24:09.925 --> 00:24:14.299
Uh, from 1994 to 2010.

00:24:14.299 --> 00:24:23.567
During the 1994 Republican revolution, democrats lost many state legislative chambers to Republicans.

00:24:23.567 --> 00:24:34.060
Uh, by 2010, democrats controlled 60 state legislative chambers, but this number decreased significantly in subsequent elections.

00:24:34.060 --> 00:24:40.728
From the period of 2010 to 2018 saw Republicans gaining control of more state legislatures.

00:24:40.728 --> 00:24:48.189
By 2014, republicans controlled 68 chambers, compared to the Democrats 30.

00:24:48.189 --> 00:24:59.095
By 2018, until now, democrats gained some ground back, starting in 2018.

00:24:59.095 --> 00:25:05.159
But by 2023, democrats controlled 41 chambers to the Republicans 56.

00:25:05.159 --> 00:25:07.240
Democrats controlled 41 chambers to the Republicans 56.

00:25:07.240 --> 00:25:12.022
So you can see where GOP state legislatures were governing from conservative principles.

00:25:12.022 --> 00:25:14.503
You see states thriving.

00:25:14.503 --> 00:25:28.532
Now, since 2018, with Donald Trump at the head of the ticket, the Republican Party is becoming more populous and less conservative as a political party, and Donald Trump is reshaping that party in his own image.

00:25:30.434 --> 00:25:34.068
Now, what about the governors?

00:25:34.068 --> 00:25:41.395
The governors?

00:25:41.395 --> 00:25:45.180
Since 1994, democratic governors had faced many setbacks.

00:25:45.180 --> 00:25:57.595
Um, it was actually, uh, the first time since 1969 that Republicans secured a majority of the governorships in an election cycle in 1994.

00:25:57.595 --> 00:26:04.515
Um, between 2010 and 2018, republicans increased their control of the governors.

00:26:04.515 --> 00:26:19.747
In 2018, republicans increased their control of the governors and by 2018, republicans held 33 governorships compared to the Democrats' 16.

00:26:19.747 --> 00:26:23.513
That's almost unheard of, and then Democrats had made some gains in recent years.

00:26:23.513 --> 00:26:31.868
They gained governorships Maryland and Massachusetts but, however, republicans still maintain a majority of the governorships across the United States.

00:26:44.624 --> 00:26:58.555
So the GOP governors, particularly those that were strong through the COVID, who I'm a big fan of, who, without a doubt, is the governor most resembling the qualities of the Reagan revolution, at least from the 1980s onward.

00:26:58.555 --> 00:26:59.778
That's how he governs.

00:26:59.778 --> 00:27:04.607
In fact, what he has done in Florida in just one term is remarkable.

00:27:04.607 --> 00:27:12.546
Has done in Florida in just one term is remarkable, so it will be absolutely interesting to see what he can do in a second term.

00:27:12.546 --> 00:27:30.098
So what began with the Reagan conservative counter-revolution in 1980 has spread like a prairie wildfire over the country and saturated a rebalancing from the New Deal policy so evident from the 1930s to the 1980s.

00:27:30.098 --> 00:27:40.721
That same revolution continued marching with the fiery brand of conservatives in Congress in 1994, and it went all the way to roughly 2008.

00:27:40.721 --> 00:27:49.330
Now, somewhere in the second term of George W Bush, the conservative revolution ebbed away.

00:27:49.330 --> 00:28:11.182
George W Bush's second term was marked with nothing resembling governing like a conservative, and he betrayed that part that actually got him there His economic foibles with the great recession in 2017 and 20, 2007 and 2008,.

00:28:11.182 --> 00:28:16.086
Uh, looked more like Herbert Hoover's policies than Ronald Reagan's.

00:28:16.086 --> 00:28:22.887
But this is about the conservative revolution and how long it lasted.

00:28:24.195 --> 00:28:39.432
So let's end with a wonderful quote that I had just read, in which I don't know if I'd ever heard anybody put the whole conservative counter-revolution together in one succinct quote.

00:28:39.432 --> 00:28:47.997
But I just read it about a week ago and I like it more and more the more I have meditated over its implications.

00:28:47.997 --> 00:28:56.074
And the quote comes to us from a wonderful book that just came in the mail.

00:28:56.074 --> 00:29:07.446
I bought it used from the old Fox news reporter major Garrett, and the title of the book is the enduring revolution how the contract with America Continues to Shape the Nation.

00:29:07.446 --> 00:29:20.586
Let's go and end this episode with this fantastic quote A decade after the Republican Revolution, this much is certain.

00:29:20.994 --> 00:29:23.003
He's writing in 2005.

00:29:23.003 --> 00:29:34.246
So roughly a decade with the Republican Revolution in 1994, continuing on from the conservative counter -revolution of 1980 with Ronald Reagan.

00:29:34.246 --> 00:29:42.415
So a decade after the Republican Revolution, this much is certain we are a different country because of the contract with America.

00:29:42.415 --> 00:29:45.269
Our direction will continue to be shaped more durably and more profitably by the contract with America.

00:29:45.269 --> 00:29:51.767
Our direction will continue to be shaped more durably and more profitably by the contract than any other manifesto of the 20th century.

00:29:51.767 --> 00:29:53.530
Where does it lead?

00:29:53.530 --> 00:29:56.781
How will the contract change America in the next 10 years?

00:29:56.781 --> 00:30:06.948
Specifically, not at all, but in tone and spirit it has already defined the next decade of the Republican domestic policy.

00:30:07.996 --> 00:30:48.476
When a president, george W Bush, and top GOP figures spoke of a quote ownership society in the 2004 campaign, they were describing a world defined by the core precepts of the contract individual choices, government incentives to save and invest for life's exigencies, and freedom from the government-produced forms, rules and allocations when it comes to retirement security through Social Security, medicine through Medicare and Medicaid, and education through public schools or college loans, or starting a small business or building an alternative to traditional one-company pensions.

00:30:48.476 --> 00:30:55.646
This isn't the contract in word or deed, but it is in spirit.

00:30:55.646 --> 00:31:02.384
One is descended from the other, just as the contract is descendant from Reaganism.

00:31:02.384 --> 00:31:18.342
And since the Republicans have solidified and expanded their power after their stunning success in the 2004 elections, they now hold even more seats in the House and Senate than they did after the historic 1994 elections.

00:31:18.342 --> 00:31:23.798
They have positioned themselves to put their imprint on American society.

00:31:23.798 --> 00:31:47.170
And here is this fantastic conservative nugget of wisdom One Republican operative deeply versed in the history of Western civilization once described it this way Reagan represented the Greeks who created and defined the broadest swaths of enlightened civilization.

00:31:48.396 --> 00:32:13.009
The contract and those who carried it out represented the Romans, who borrowed from the Greeks but added a muscularity and a practicality that spread civilization across much of the known world and President Bush's ownership society represented the Byzantines, who moved away from some aspects of Roman rule but remained faithful to the Greek definition of civilization.

00:32:13.009 --> 00:32:17.685
The analogy is by no means perfect.

00:32:17.685 --> 00:32:30.717
Reducing centuries-old civilizations to the crudites of American executive and legislative politics is, one must confess, a bit more than a bit garish.

00:32:30.717 --> 00:32:43.887
But if you think of Reagan as the center of the GOP universe, which we should the wellspring of its intellectual and political identity, then yes, the Greek analogy applies.

00:32:43.887 --> 00:33:05.501
Similarly, the Republican congressional majority was nothing if not Roman in its ferocity and techno-prisoner's approach to politics, and it had remade the political landscape, bringing the GOP into parts of the country where, at least legislatively, it had never or rarely trod before.

00:33:05.501 --> 00:33:08.587
So the Roman analogy roughly fits.

00:33:09.595 --> 00:33:21.270
As for the Byzantines, they moved the geographic center of the Roman Empire eastward and thereby cut the cords with Rome in its militaristic and expansionist ways.

00:33:21.270 --> 00:33:28.689
They also offered a softer version of that culture, borrowing more from Greek culture and Greek politics.

00:33:28.689 --> 00:33:42.445
In this the Bush reign the first time a Republican president enjoyed a concentrated Republican congressional majority since the time of Herbert Hoover can be seen at least partially Byzantine.

00:33:42.445 --> 00:33:54.726
It has paid homage to Reagan with tax cuts and strong defense, but has also sloughed off some of the harsher forms of the early GOP congressional revolutionaries.

00:33:54.726 --> 00:34:17.614
The Romans adapted to the real-world political realities by spending more on domestic programs, education chief among them, and redefined the approach to conservatism by adapting limited free market concepts to pre-existing entitlement programs such as medicare, greek, roman and byzantine.

00:34:18.876 --> 00:34:27.918
It may all seem an almost ludicrous stretch, but republic Republicans who have been living through this period and pondering its future don't think so.

00:34:27.918 --> 00:34:45.123
And perhaps the best place to end this dissection of the contract with America is with a question Can any other period in American political history ascribe to itself such an epochal intellectual and cultural heritage?

00:34:45.123 --> 00:34:49.610
I, for one, one can't think of any.

00:34:49.610 --> 00:35:13.188
And so, in today's Mojo Minute, know that the Reagan Revolution, which began in 1980, lasted a very long time and ushered in a restoration of the constitutional order, a revitalization of the American spirit and economic prosperity for more than some 25 years, all the way into the mid-2000s.

00:35:13.188 --> 00:35:22.143
And this is not a nostalgia for Reagan himself but for the principles of the conservative revolution he helped to launch.

00:35:23.496 --> 00:35:28.106
Remember, reagan had developed these principles from the 1950s and the 60s.

00:35:28.106 --> 00:35:35.248
He supported Goldwater in 1964 when he gave the infamous time for choosing speech.

00:35:35.248 --> 00:35:40.724
Conservatives lost badly in 1964, but Reagan's principles endured.

00:35:40.724 --> 00:35:46.802
He kept fighting for those principles because he believed in them At his root, at his gut.

00:35:46.802 --> 00:35:53.463
He won the California governor race twice and he began implementing those principles.

00:35:54.175 --> 00:36:02.621
He runs for president in 76, and he challenges an incumbent but very weak president, gerald Ford, in the primaries Unheard of for the time.

00:36:02.621 --> 00:36:04.862
He comes up just short.

00:36:04.862 --> 00:36:13.605
Reagan keeps fighting for those conservative principles and he finally breaks through in 1980 and wins, and wins big.

00:36:13.605 --> 00:36:16.637
And then, as we know, the rest is history.

00:36:16.637 --> 00:36:24.597
So we've learned a great deal from the conservative retelling of that history over the last five weeks.

00:36:24.597 --> 00:37:02.211
And so again, the conservative principles of the counter-revolution should be studied because they are the principles of the founding of our American government, of our constitutional representative republic, and there is so much to learn and to be studied what those principles that helped to restore the constitutional order and how they helped to restore it again in 1980, which has lasted roughly all the way until 2005, with that fiery brand of conservatives in Congress.

00:37:02.211 --> 00:37:10.344
So with that, let's keep fighting for those conservative principles and, as always, let's keep fighting the good fight.

00:37:12.576 --> 00:37:13.818
Thank you for joining us.

00:37:13.818 --> 00:37:17.208
We hope you enjoyed this Theory to Action podcast.

00:37:17.208 --> 00:37:26.385
Be sure to check out our show page at teammojoacademycom, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast, as well as other great resources.

00:37:31.675 --> 00:37:43.347
Until next time, keep getting your mojo on.

MM#347---The Conservative Revolution Lives on in 1994

Listen On

Recent Episodes